Posted on 7/6/2016 6:39 AM by Ron Manz 107.5 KISSFM
Vernon residents have their third and final chance to provide input into the Vernon Regional Airport Master Plan. An open house is being held at the Laker's Clubhouse on Cummins Road today (Wednesday) from 5 - 7 p.m. City staff will on hand to answer any questions about the plan, facility improvements, development phases and funding sources. The plan focuses on upgrades within the existing airport lands without expansion or a runway extension.
Showing posts with label master airport plan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label master airport plan. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 06, 2016
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Kamloops Airport flying high with new funding
News Release Kamloops Monday, June 27, 2016 9:15 AM
The Government of B.C. is providing $2.6 million in B.C. Air Access Program funding to support improvements at Kamloops Airport, announced Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Todd Stone.
“A thriving, vibrant airport is a critical engine of growth for any community. The Kamloops Airport has seen an increase of over 25% in passenger volumes in the past five years, helping to drive growth in many sectors so important to Kamloops such as mining and tourism, as well as at Thompson Rivers University,” said Stone. “These infrastructure safety improvements will go a long way to ensuring the Kamloops Airport is able to continue to drive growth and jobs in Kamloops, the Thompson Valleys and British Columbia.”
With the support of B.C. Air Access funds, the Kamloops Airport will rehabilitate a section of the airport apron, or the area where aircraft park to load, unload and refuel. The apron can get congested, which has the potential to delay the movement of aircraft during peak periods. This project will ensure the safe and efficient manoeuvring of all air traffic, as well as vehicles and personnel servicing aircraft. In addition, a new dedicated vehicle access route to the apron will be built. The airport will provide the remaining funds needed to complete this $3.4-million improvement to the airport.
The Government of B.C. is providing $2.6 million in B.C. Air Access Program funding to support improvements at Kamloops Airport, announced Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Todd Stone.
“A thriving, vibrant airport is a critical engine of growth for any community. The Kamloops Airport has seen an increase of over 25% in passenger volumes in the past five years, helping to drive growth in many sectors so important to Kamloops such as mining and tourism, as well as at Thompson Rivers University,” said Stone. “These infrastructure safety improvements will go a long way to ensuring the Kamloops Airport is able to continue to drive growth and jobs in Kamloops, the Thompson Valleys and British Columbia.”
With the support of B.C. Air Access funds, the Kamloops Airport will rehabilitate a section of the airport apron, or the area where aircraft park to load, unload and refuel. The apron can get congested, which has the potential to delay the movement of aircraft during peak periods. This project will ensure the safe and efficient manoeuvring of all air traffic, as well as vehicles and personnel servicing aircraft. In addition, a new dedicated vehicle access route to the apron will be built. The airport will provide the remaining funds needed to complete this $3.4-million improvement to the airport.
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Back on the radar
By Kate Bouey - CASTANET Jun 21, 2016 / 5:00 am
Plans for Vernon Regional Airport are being thrown open to the public once again. Residents and business owners are invited to a third and final public open house which will be held at the Lakers Clubhouse (7000 Cummins Road) on Wednesday, July 6, from 5-7 p.m. During the session, City of Vernon staff will provide a review and ask for input on city council’s endorsed development plan. In March, council voted 5-2 against a $4.3 million extension of the airport's one runway. However, council OK'd about $2 million for capacity improvements and upgrades within the existing airport lands without expansion or the controversial runway extension.
The objectives of the master plan are:
The new master plan is also intended to outline a vision for alternative ways to operate a viable small size airport within the city boundaries for the next 20 years. The airport has been in operation since 1946.
The objectives of the master plan are:
- to evaluate existing and future aviation needs
- to determine long range facility requirements
- to assess site development alternatives
- to produce a plan which yields an economically viable, safe and sustainable public facility
The new master plan is also intended to outline a vision for alternative ways to operate a viable small size airport within the city boundaries for the next 20 years. The airport has been in operation since 1946.
Monday, March 14, 2016
Vernon council abandons plans for 'now or never' runway extension
By Charlotte Helston INFO.News.Ca March 14, 2016 - 4:30 PM
VERNON - There aren’t any big changes in the picture for Vernon’s airport.A majority of council voted against extending the runway, a ‘now or never’ project that would have had to happen by September 2017 at the latest, due to new Transport Canada regulations coming into effect. Coun. Catherine Lord wanted to explore the possibility of funding the $5.2 million runway extension with grants, and is disappointed the concept was shot down.“We’ve missed the boat,” Lord says. “I think we’ve done a real disservice to Vernon.” She says expanding the airport would have bolstered the local economy with at least 17 more jobs and boosted the facility’s Gross Domestic Product output to roughly $65 million, up from $54 million. She also felt the extension, which would allow more types of aircraft to land, was an important consideration in terms of future medivac needs. Mayor Akbal Mund voted against the extension partly because of the tight timeline, but doesn’t feel it will be a big loss for the community. He admits it would have generated more jobs, but questions whether it would have been worth it for the average taxpayer. “Would it be beneficial for the amount of money dispensed? No, you’ll never see a return on it,” Mund says. Coun. Bob Spiers is pleased council settled on the more conservative option, which will see $2 million invested into maintenance and repairs. “I believe we have a viable airport there now,” Spiers says.
------------
Also See: http://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-160758-2-.htm#160758
and http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/372038561.html
and https://www.vernon.ca/activities-events/news-events/news-archive/council-votes-maximize-airport-value-without-expansion
============
Option 2 was the option supported by council:
VERNON - There aren’t any big changes in the picture for Vernon’s airport.A majority of council voted against extending the runway, a ‘now or never’ project that would have had to happen by September 2017 at the latest, due to new Transport Canada regulations coming into effect. Coun. Catherine Lord wanted to explore the possibility of funding the $5.2 million runway extension with grants, and is disappointed the concept was shot down.“We’ve missed the boat,” Lord says. “I think we’ve done a real disservice to Vernon.” She says expanding the airport would have bolstered the local economy with at least 17 more jobs and boosted the facility’s Gross Domestic Product output to roughly $65 million, up from $54 million. She also felt the extension, which would allow more types of aircraft to land, was an important consideration in terms of future medivac needs. Mayor Akbal Mund voted against the extension partly because of the tight timeline, but doesn’t feel it will be a big loss for the community. He admits it would have generated more jobs, but questions whether it would have been worth it for the average taxpayer. “Would it be beneficial for the amount of money dispensed? No, you’ll never see a return on it,” Mund says. Coun. Bob Spiers is pleased council settled on the more conservative option, which will see $2 million invested into maintenance and repairs. “I believe we have a viable airport there now,” Spiers says.
------------
Also See: http://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-160758-2-.htm#160758
and http://www.vernonmorningstar.com/news/372038561.html
and https://www.vernon.ca/activities-events/news-events/news-archive/council-votes-maximize-airport-value-without-expansion
============
Option 2 was the option supported by council:
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Vernon airport plan again
Kate Bouey - CASTANET Mar 13, 2016 / 5:00 am
A draft regional airport master plan is once again before Vernon city council, Monday, with staff recommending no extension of the current runway for the third time in a row. Some councillors had rebuffed earlier recommendations to rule out the expensive runway upgrade, instead ordering staff to rework the numbers on the cost of building an extension. Last time, Coun. Catherine Lord said that if the project does not go ahead now it never will, due to a change in Transport Canada regulations. Lord rejected a cost estimate for a runway extension set at $5.2 million, stating it could be lower. A revised estimate puts the cost at $4.3 million. Council is being asked to endorse a development alternative that does not include an extension of the runway and calls for further public consultation ahead of developing a detailed implementation and funding strategy. It also recommends exploring the feasibility of designating land north of the airport for "employment lands."
A draft regional airport master plan is once again before Vernon city council, Monday, with staff recommending no extension of the current runway for the third time in a row. Some councillors had rebuffed earlier recommendations to rule out the expensive runway upgrade, instead ordering staff to rework the numbers on the cost of building an extension. Last time, Coun. Catherine Lord said that if the project does not go ahead now it never will, due to a change in Transport Canada regulations. Lord rejected a cost estimate for a runway extension set at $5.2 million, stating it could be lower. A revised estimate puts the cost at $4.3 million. Council is being asked to endorse a development alternative that does not include an extension of the runway and calls for further public consultation ahead of developing a detailed implementation and funding strategy. It also recommends exploring the feasibility of designating land north of the airport for "employment lands."
Friday, March 11, 2016
Runway Extension Not Backed By Staff
Posted on 3/11/2016 by Pete McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM
Vernon city staff are recommending council not proceed with a runway extension at the regional airport. The issue comes up for a decision on Monday at City hall. Some on council feel extending the runway to four-thousand feet will spark economic activity, allowing more planes to land and more business opportunities. Others on council are not sure taxpayers want to foot the bill for that, while some nearby residents have stated opposition to more activity at the facility. The extension would cost anywhere from 4.2 million dollars...to 5.2 million. In Monday's agenda, City long range planner Roy Nuriel recommends council endorse a development alternative which does not include an extension of the runway. Council has several other development options, ranging in price from just under $1 million, to over $11 million for a runway extension and expansion.
Monday, February 22, 2016
Airport Decision Delayed
Posted on 2/22/2016 by Pete McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM
Possible improvements to the Vernon airport remain stuck on the tarmac. City council has deferred a decision on a possible runway extension, until city staff can take another look at the price tag. Councillor Catherine Lord feels the current 5.2 million dollar cost can be pared down. "The original estimate was 2.4 million.The second estimate came in at 5.2 million, so it probably might land somewhere in between, but I have no idea where it's going to land." Lord isn't sure how council will vote on the extension, but she says if it isn't done now, it will never get done due to changing regulations. "It's one of those things that we only get a shot at one time," says Lord. Mayor Akbal Mund says the current estimate for an extension is too pricey. "When you get a five million dollar price tag, you've got to look at that and go 'Is that going to be best for our community?' Probably not, so let's look at the real numbers and find out what they are. Then we can make a decision that will be based on logic," says Mund. At their February 8th meeting, staff presented council with several options ranging from about $1million in improvements to buildings at the low end, and up to an 11 million dollar project which would include the runway extension and an expansion.
Possible improvements to the Vernon airport remain stuck on the tarmac. City council has deferred a decision on a possible runway extension, until city staff can take another look at the price tag. Councillor Catherine Lord feels the current 5.2 million dollar cost can be pared down. "The original estimate was 2.4 million.The second estimate came in at 5.2 million, so it probably might land somewhere in between, but I have no idea where it's going to land." Lord isn't sure how council will vote on the extension, but she says if it isn't done now, it will never get done due to changing regulations. "It's one of those things that we only get a shot at one time," says Lord. Mayor Akbal Mund says the current estimate for an extension is too pricey. "When you get a five million dollar price tag, you've got to look at that and go 'Is that going to be best for our community?' Probably not, so let's look at the real numbers and find out what they are. Then we can make a decision that will be based on logic," says Mund. At their February 8th meeting, staff presented council with several options ranging from about $1million in improvements to buildings at the low end, and up to an 11 million dollar project which would include the runway extension and an expansion.
Vernon Airport Plan on Agenda
Posted on 2/22/2016 by Pete McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM
Vernon council will make a decision today on future plans for the city's airport.Mayor Akbal Mund says the development options range in cost from around one million dollars, to 11 million which were briefly discussed by council last month."People got it wrong when the last council meeting that everybody decided that oh "why is council going ahead with a $5-million dollar expansion?" We didn't decide to do that. We decided to discuss it and have a further look at that."Mund says the options range from upgrading the existing facilities, to extending the runway for 5.2 million dollars."Option 1 and 2 are below the two million dollar mark, but option 2-B was the one with the runway extension which obviously meant work to divert the creek and so riparian issues and that's what drives up the cost to $5-million dollars." Some council members support spending 5.2 million dollars to extend the runway which would allow more types of planes to land, and spur economic development. Mund supports at least upgrading some of the facilities, but he's not sure which way council could go."I think you need to have something there. Some of the buildings need some help. No matter what options there is, I'm sure all the council members have had enough time to go through everything and gather all the information they needed."Others argue, it's not needed with Kelowna's airport so close by, or too expensive for taxpayers.
============
Vernon council will make a decision today on future plans for the city's airport.Mayor Akbal Mund says the development options range in cost from around one million dollars, to 11 million which were briefly discussed by council last month."People got it wrong when the last council meeting that everybody decided that oh "why is council going ahead with a $5-million dollar expansion?" We didn't decide to do that. We decided to discuss it and have a further look at that."Mund says the options range from upgrading the existing facilities, to extending the runway for 5.2 million dollars."Option 1 and 2 are below the two million dollar mark, but option 2-B was the one with the runway extension which obviously meant work to divert the creek and so riparian issues and that's what drives up the cost to $5-million dollars." Some council members support spending 5.2 million dollars to extend the runway which would allow more types of planes to land, and spur economic development. Mund supports at least upgrading some of the facilities, but he's not sure which way council could go."I think you need to have something there. Some of the buildings need some help. No matter what options there is, I'm sure all the council members have had enough time to go through everything and gather all the information they needed."Others argue, it's not needed with Kelowna's airport so close by, or too expensive for taxpayers.
============
Sunday, February 07, 2016
Options on the table
by Kate Bouey - CASTANET Feb 6, 2016 / 1:00 pm
City council has released reams of formerly classified information on development options for Vernon Regional Airport. The various options range in projected costs from $986,400 to $11,063,300. Council has yet to make any decisions. The analysis includes aviation demand forecasts, development cost projections and employment impact estimates. The draft airport master plan is scheduled for further discussion at council's Feb. 22 meeting. The newly-released documents can be found on the City of Vernon website. Meanwhile, in a letter to Castanet, one Okanagan Landing resident called for information on the environmental impact of a longer air strip and the possibility of larger aircraft. “Any expansion will be done at the cost of taxpayers and it will seal the fate of Okanagan Landing.” wrote Janice Misutka. City staff have not recommended going ahead with an expansion of the runway but some council members have asked for further information. Staff warned that an expansion would have to be approved soon, ahead of new Transport Canada regulations that could nix such development in the future. “It should raise red flags to everyone,” said Misutka. “Why would you fast track any project when you know there are changes coming?”
----------
Declassified Presentation from In-Camera Council Workshop, February 4, 2016.
----------
Declassified Presentation from In-Camera Council Workshop, February 4, 2016.
Friday, February 05, 2016
DRAFT Vernon Regional Airport Master Plan
February 5, 2016 News
City Council has released additional information regarding the economic impact analysis of various development options for the Vernon Regional Airport. The analysis includes aviation demand forecasts, development cost projections and employment impact estimates. The additional information also includes an evaluation of potential funding sources for the development options which range in projected costs from $986,400 to $11,063,300.
The draft Vernon Regional Airport Master Plan is scheduled for further discussion at the regular meeting of City Council on February 22, 2016. The additional information can be found on the City’s website on the home page. Scroll down to “What’s happening in Vernon” to see the Declassified Presentation from In-Camera Council Workshop, February 4, 2016.
- See more at: https://www.vernon.ca/activities-events/news-events/news-archive/draft-vernon-regional-airport-master-plan#sthash.5ZE7eceM.dpuf
City Council has released additional information regarding the economic impact analysis of various development options for the Vernon Regional Airport. The analysis includes aviation demand forecasts, development cost projections and employment impact estimates. The additional information also includes an evaluation of potential funding sources for the development options which range in projected costs from $986,400 to $11,063,300.
The draft Vernon Regional Airport Master Plan is scheduled for further discussion at the regular meeting of City Council on February 22, 2016. The additional information can be found on the City’s website on the home page. Scroll down to “What’s happening in Vernon” to see the Declassified Presentation from In-Camera Council Workshop, February 4, 2016.
- See more at: https://www.vernon.ca/activities-events/news-events/news-archive/draft-vernon-regional-airport-master-plan#sthash.5ZE7eceM.dpuf
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Runway plan gets clearance
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Jan 27, 2016 at 1:00 AM— updated Jan 27, 2016 at 6:00 AM
Support for extending the runway at Vernon Regional Airport is taking flight. While city staff had recommended not extending the runway, a majority of council voted Monday to further investigate lengthening the runway from 3,500 to 4,000 feet at a cost of $7.2 million. “If we don’t do the runway extension and lose some business, what will the impact be?” said Coun. Catherine Lord of local corporations that use the airport. “Our airport is an economic driver and creates a lot of jobs. It (extension) could be a large driver.” Coun. Scott Anderson is concerned not having a sufficient runway will prevent new companies from moving to Vernon. “Every community cries for high-tech and green jobs and we have to put that infrastructure in place,” he said. However, staff has previously stated that only marginal increases in economic activity would come from a longer runway and the current length meets the needs of 97 per cent of aircraft movements. Another issue that has been raised is noise. “There are a lot of houses and development there,” said Coun. Dalvir Nahal. As part of the process, a committee will review the option of extending the runway, including potential economic benefits. Discussions will be held with corporations that use the airport. “We haven’t explored this as aggressively as we need to,” said Coun. Juliette Cunningham. Transport Canada has dictated that any runway extension must occur by September 2017. Coun. Bob Spiers opposed endorsing the $7.2 million project and possibly an ultimate $11 million extension because of the burden on taxpayers. “If there is such a great economic benefit, who is it going to and why don’t they pay for it?” he said. “I’m happy with the airport we have now.”
----------
Don Quixote Note:
Latest Cost Link of various options presented to Council:
The recommended option that was put forward in the report is at the far right ($5,892,000) which is a hybrid between Option 2 and the addition of the Triangle land acquisition and a few other items taken from option 3.
I stated that I could support Option ($2,056,000) which essentially are life cycle maintenance items and adding some runway expansion and apron improvements.
From P.124 of report: (taxation possibility)
'Excluding the runway rehabilitation costs and the land acquisition costs, funding the remaining amount of $2,430,600 over 20 years would require an additional $121,530 per year, amounting to an annual tax increase of 0.357% (based on the current assessment roll). However, this assumes that all of the land acquisition costs can be accommodated within the Land Reserve. Should this not be the case, then a higher tax increase would be required.'
If the 11,603,500 (Full runway extension option) was ultimately approved and had to be solely funded from taxation based on the same ratio above over 20 years then the tax would be required to be 11,603,300/2,430,600x$121,350 =$579,305 per year (1.7042%). On the same page of reports are other possible funding sources that could reduce the future tax burden.
https://www.vernon.ca/sites/default/files/docs/meetings/agendas/160125_regular.pdf (p.456)
==========
KISSFM Poll Results as at 4:30 PM
Would you like to see the runway extended at the Vernon Airport to encourage more economic activity?
Yes 38.3%
No 48.6%
Need more information 13.2%
=======
Kelowna Airport Master Plan
http://apps.kelowna.ca/CityPage/Docs/PDFs/Kelowna%20International%20Airport/2025%20Airport%20Master%20Plan.pdf
Support for extending the runway at Vernon Regional Airport is taking flight. While city staff had recommended not extending the runway, a majority of council voted Monday to further investigate lengthening the runway from 3,500 to 4,000 feet at a cost of $7.2 million. “If we don’t do the runway extension and lose some business, what will the impact be?” said Coun. Catherine Lord of local corporations that use the airport. “Our airport is an economic driver and creates a lot of jobs. It (extension) could be a large driver.” Coun. Scott Anderson is concerned not having a sufficient runway will prevent new companies from moving to Vernon. “Every community cries for high-tech and green jobs and we have to put that infrastructure in place,” he said. However, staff has previously stated that only marginal increases in economic activity would come from a longer runway and the current length meets the needs of 97 per cent of aircraft movements. Another issue that has been raised is noise. “There are a lot of houses and development there,” said Coun. Dalvir Nahal. As part of the process, a committee will review the option of extending the runway, including potential economic benefits. Discussions will be held with corporations that use the airport. “We haven’t explored this as aggressively as we need to,” said Coun. Juliette Cunningham. Transport Canada has dictated that any runway extension must occur by September 2017. Coun. Bob Spiers opposed endorsing the $7.2 million project and possibly an ultimate $11 million extension because of the burden on taxpayers. “If there is such a great economic benefit, who is it going to and why don’t they pay for it?” he said. “I’m happy with the airport we have now.”
----------
Don Quixote Note:
Latest Cost Link of various options presented to Council:
The recommended option that was put forward in the report is at the far right ($5,892,000) which is a hybrid between Option 2 and the addition of the Triangle land acquisition and a few other items taken from option 3.
I stated that I could support Option ($2,056,000) which essentially are life cycle maintenance items and adding some runway expansion and apron improvements.
From P.124 of report: (taxation possibility)
'Excluding the runway rehabilitation costs and the land acquisition costs, funding the remaining amount of $2,430,600 over 20 years would require an additional $121,530 per year, amounting to an annual tax increase of 0.357% (based on the current assessment roll). However, this assumes that all of the land acquisition costs can be accommodated within the Land Reserve. Should this not be the case, then a higher tax increase would be required.'
If the 11,603,500 (Full runway extension option) was ultimately approved and had to be solely funded from taxation based on the same ratio above over 20 years then the tax would be required to be 11,603,300/2,430,600x$121,350 =$579,305 per year (1.7042%). On the same page of reports are other possible funding sources that could reduce the future tax burden.
https://www.vernon.ca/sites/default/files/docs/meetings/agendas/160125_regular.pdf (p.456)
KISSFM Poll Results as at 4:30 PM
Would you like to see the runway extended at the Vernon Airport to encourage more economic activity?
Yes 38.3%
No 48.6%
Need more information 13.2%
=======
Kelowna Airport Master Plan
http://apps.kelowna.ca/CityPage/Docs/PDFs/Kelowna%20International%20Airport/2025%20Airport%20Master%20Plan.pdf
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Vernon airport quandary
by Kate Bouey -CASTANET Jan 26, 2016 / 5:00 am
Vernon city council has refused to be pushed into making a decision on the future of the regional airport and support is mixed on the question of expanding the runway. Staff had suggested council consider a plan to improve airport land but not to extend the runway. However Coun. Scott Anderson expressed concern over the loss of future corporate business if expansion did not happen. “What's difficult to factor is the lost opportunity.” The airport is used by Kal Aviation, Okanagan Skydive, Coldstream Helicopters and Advantage Helicopters as well as private owners. “We need discussions with core users to see how they'd benefit from an extended runway,” said Coun. Catherine Lord. A runway extension alone would cost $5.2 million, before other proposed improvements to the airport including land acquisition, new hangars and a helipad. Staff has warned council that proceeding with an extension to the runway would have to move speedily due to new Transport Canada regulations. Those regulations would not affect the runway if it was completed by Sept. 2017. “If there's going to be a great economic benefit, who's going to pay for it?” asked Coun. Bob Spiers, adding the numbers added up to a 1.5 per cent increase in taxes for residents for many years. “I'm quite happy with the airport we have now.” Coun. Brian Quiring said a number of his clients fly into the airport with no problem. While he could see the window of opportunity closing on the extension, he questioned the dollars and cents gain. “I'm struggling as to how we get there. I don't think it's right.” He likened a multi-million dollar expansion of the runway to “delusions of grandeur.” Coun. Dalvir Nahal said an extension could add to the noise problem in a residential area. No decision has been taken.
-----------
Don Quixote Note:
Latest Cost Link of various options presented to Council:
The recommended option that was put forward in the report is at the far right ($5,892,000) which is a hybrid between Option 2 and the addition of the Triangle land acquisition and a few other items taken from option 3.
I stated that I could support Option ($2,056,000) which essentially are life cycle maintenance items and adding some runway expansion and apron improvements.
From P.124 of report: (taxation possibility)
'Excluding the runway rehabilitation costs and the land acquisition costs, funding the remaining amount of $2,430,600 over 20 years would require an additional $121,530 per year, amounting to an annual tax increase of 0.357% (based on the current assessment roll). However, this assumes that all of the land acquisition costs can be accommodated within the Land Reserve. Should this not be the case, then a higher tax increase would be required.'
If the 11,603,500 (Full runway extension option) was ultimately approved and had to be solely funded from taxation based on the same ratio above over 20 years then the tax would be required to be 11,603,300/2,430,600x$121,350 =$579,305 per year (1.7042%). On the same page of reports are other possible funding sources that could reduce the future tax burden.
https://www.vernon.ca/sites/default/files/docs/meetings/agendas/160125_regular.pdf (p.456)
Vernon city council has refused to be pushed into making a decision on the future of the regional airport and support is mixed on the question of expanding the runway. Staff had suggested council consider a plan to improve airport land but not to extend the runway. However Coun. Scott Anderson expressed concern over the loss of future corporate business if expansion did not happen. “What's difficult to factor is the lost opportunity.” The airport is used by Kal Aviation, Okanagan Skydive, Coldstream Helicopters and Advantage Helicopters as well as private owners. “We need discussions with core users to see how they'd benefit from an extended runway,” said Coun. Catherine Lord. A runway extension alone would cost $5.2 million, before other proposed improvements to the airport including land acquisition, new hangars and a helipad. Staff has warned council that proceeding with an extension to the runway would have to move speedily due to new Transport Canada regulations. Those regulations would not affect the runway if it was completed by Sept. 2017. “If there's going to be a great economic benefit, who's going to pay for it?” asked Coun. Bob Spiers, adding the numbers added up to a 1.5 per cent increase in taxes for residents for many years. “I'm quite happy with the airport we have now.” Coun. Brian Quiring said a number of his clients fly into the airport with no problem. While he could see the window of opportunity closing on the extension, he questioned the dollars and cents gain. “I'm struggling as to how we get there. I don't think it's right.” He likened a multi-million dollar expansion of the runway to “delusions of grandeur.” Coun. Dalvir Nahal said an extension could add to the noise problem in a residential area. No decision has been taken.
-----------
Don Quixote Note:
Latest Cost Link of various options presented to Council:
The recommended option that was put forward in the report is at the far right ($5,892,000) which is a hybrid between Option 2 and the addition of the Triangle land acquisition and a few other items taken from option 3.
I stated that I could support Option ($2,056,000) which essentially are life cycle maintenance items and adding some runway expansion and apron improvements.
From P.124 of report: (taxation possibility)
'Excluding the runway rehabilitation costs and the land acquisition costs, funding the remaining amount of $2,430,600 over 20 years would require an additional $121,530 per year, amounting to an annual tax increase of 0.357% (based on the current assessment roll). However, this assumes that all of the land acquisition costs can be accommodated within the Land Reserve. Should this not be the case, then a higher tax increase would be required.'
If the 11,603,500 (Full runway extension option) was ultimately approved and had to be solely funded from taxation based on the same ratio above over 20 years then the tax would be required to be 11,603,300/2,430,600x$121,350 =$579,305 per year (1.7042%). On the same page of reports are other possible funding sources that could reduce the future tax burden.
https://www.vernon.ca/sites/default/files/docs/meetings/agendas/160125_regular.pdf (p.456)
Saturday, January 16, 2016
OKIB sees airport plan
By Kate Bouey - Jan 16, 2016 / 5:00 am CASTANET
Four options for growth at Vernon regional airport have been presented to members of the Okanagan Indian Band at a meeting at City Hall, Friday. “There's a lot to digest,” said Lyle Brewer, OKIB councillor, referring to a thick report tucked under his arm. “We will respond after we've sat down with impacted land owners (on the reserve) and council,” Brewer said, following his meeting with city staff and councillor Catherine Lord to review the report. The draft airport master plan sets out differing scenarios for the future of the airport, varying from maintaining existing airport assets with safety improvements all the way to acquiring property for a runway extension, new hangars and a helipad. “Based on the economic impact analysis for various development scenarios, the runway extension offers only a marginal increase in economic activity and would have a detrimental impact on surrounding neighbourhoods, particularly with regard to noise and development potential,” stated the report. “The current runway length also meets the needs of approximately 97 per cent of aircraft movements at the airport, and would fulfil most of the airport's needs for the next 20 years.” Figures show 130 aircraft were based at the airport in 2014, most single engine, general aviation used by private owners. The airport is also used by Kal Aviation, Okanagan Skydive, Coldstream Helicopters and Advantage Helicopters.
-------------
https://www.vernon.ca/roads-transportation/airport/airport-master-plan/documents-information
-------------
https://www.vernon.ca/roads-transportation/airport/airport-master-plan/documents-information
Monday, December 14, 2015
Debate soars over Vernon airport extension possibly being scrapped
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Dec 14, 2015 at 11:00 AM— updated Dec 14, 2015 at 12:18 PM
There’s some high-flying debate over the future of Vernon Regional Airport. Some city council members expressed concern Monday with a staff recommendation not to extend the airport runway from 3,500 to 4,000 feet. “It would be one way to attract corporate offices to Vernon,” said Coun. Scott Anderson on some company’s being reliant on aircraft. “We have one now, Kal Tire, and even if we had three, it would make a substantial difference.” Mayor Akbal Mund also questions if maintaining a shorter runway will hamper the community’s economic development opportunities. “How will that affect the corporate sector? Does the additional 500 feet bring corporate jets to safety standards.” The extension would cost about $5.2 million. “Based on the economic impact analysis for various development scenarios, the runway extension offers only a marginal increase in economic activity and would have a detrimental impact on surrounding neighbourhoods, particularly with regard to noise and development potential,” said Roy Nuriel, long ranger planner, in a report. “The current runway length also meets the needs of about 97 per cent of aircraft movements at the airport.” Transport Canada has dictated that any runway extension must occur by September 2017. “If we don’t extend the runway now, that’s it forever. But the benefit doesn’t rationalize the cost,” said Coun. Catherine Lord. However, Mund also points to the growing number of planes of all sizes using the airport. “The extension could be important,” he said. In 2014, there were about 15,485 takeoffs and landings. On Monday, Nuriel presented a draft of the airport master plan. It proposes upgrades to the airport and development of land to the north for industrial uses. Through city and private dollars, the price tag could be $5.8 million. Presently, 97 people work at businesses at the airport, generating $6.5 million in wages and benefits and an economic impact of $11.1 million. Nuriel is calling on the city to abandon a previous strategy for housing units inside hangars. “Many of the stakeholders say they’d rather live somewhere nicer than the airport,” he said. The city is consulting with the Okanagan Indian Band about the master airport plan and the document will be before council Jan. 25 for discussion.
There’s some high-flying debate over the future of Vernon Regional Airport. Some city council members expressed concern Monday with a staff recommendation not to extend the airport runway from 3,500 to 4,000 feet. “It would be one way to attract corporate offices to Vernon,” said Coun. Scott Anderson on some company’s being reliant on aircraft. “We have one now, Kal Tire, and even if we had three, it would make a substantial difference.” Mayor Akbal Mund also questions if maintaining a shorter runway will hamper the community’s economic development opportunities. “How will that affect the corporate sector? Does the additional 500 feet bring corporate jets to safety standards.” The extension would cost about $5.2 million. “Based on the economic impact analysis for various development scenarios, the runway extension offers only a marginal increase in economic activity and would have a detrimental impact on surrounding neighbourhoods, particularly with regard to noise and development potential,” said Roy Nuriel, long ranger planner, in a report. “The current runway length also meets the needs of about 97 per cent of aircraft movements at the airport.” Transport Canada has dictated that any runway extension must occur by September 2017. “If we don’t extend the runway now, that’s it forever. But the benefit doesn’t rationalize the cost,” said Coun. Catherine Lord. However, Mund also points to the growing number of planes of all sizes using the airport. “The extension could be important,” he said. In 2014, there were about 15,485 takeoffs and landings. On Monday, Nuriel presented a draft of the airport master plan. It proposes upgrades to the airport and development of land to the north for industrial uses. Through city and private dollars, the price tag could be $5.8 million. Presently, 97 people work at businesses at the airport, generating $6.5 million in wages and benefits and an economic impact of $11.1 million. Nuriel is calling on the city to abandon a previous strategy for housing units inside hangars. “Many of the stakeholders say they’d rather live somewhere nicer than the airport,” he said. The city is consulting with the Okanagan Indian Band about the master airport plan and the document will be before council Jan. 25 for discussion.
Flying high in Vernon
by Kate Bouey - CASTANET Dec 14, 2015 / 5:00 am
A report to city council says activity at Vernon Regional Airport has increased 37 per cent in the past five years and is expected to continue that upward trend. The report sets out four options for growth in a draft Vernon Regional Airport Master Plan, but the authors are cautious about any expansion of the sole runway.
-Option one focuses on maintaining existing airport assets, with improvements for safety and security reasons. Runway rehabilitation, the construction of a new terminal building, a new gate and signage would cost an estimated $986,400.
-Option two would go farther, also adding new hangars along Tronson Road, a new taxiway and a dedicated helipad.
-Option 2.b suggests a similar plan, as well as lengthening the runway to 1,219.2 m (4,000 feet) by diverting Vernon Creek through a new culvert. Total cost of those improvements is estimated at $7,227,300.
-Option three includes all of the above improvements, plus the expansion of Apron 1 toward the east and the acquisition of a number of properties to the east of the airport, between Okanagan Landing and Tronson roads at an estimated cost of $11,063,300.
While no recommendations are made, planners warn of any runway expansion.
“Extension of the runway to 4,000 feet has a doubtful viability,” state the report's authors. “At an estimated $5.2 million, the runway extension represents a very large investment for the community, and such an investment should provide a very clear benefit. “Based on the economic impact analysis for various development scenarios, the runway extension offers only a marginal increase in economic activity and would have a detrimental impact on surrounding neighbourhoods, particularly with regard to noise and development potential. “The current runway length also meets the needs of approximately 97 per cent of aircraft movements at the airport, and would fulfil most of the airport's needs for the next 20 years.”
Figures show 130 aircraft were based at the airport in 2014, most single engine, general aviation used by private owners. Within commercial use aircraft, Kal Aviation operates two turbo jet aircrafts, Okanagan Skydive operates two aircraft, and Coldstream Helicopters and Advantage Helicopters operate three helicopters each, the report says.
Planners stress this is a preliminary document to allow council input. It also comes ahead of a Jan. 15 meeting with the Okanagan Indian Band (OKIB) to discuss the draft proposal. The draft plan includes estimates for anticipated demand for services and requirements over the next twenty years, including:
61 per cent in increase in aircraft movements (15,482 movements in 2015 to 24,980 in 2035)
36 per cent increase in fuel sales (535,825 litres in 2015 to 730,496 in 2035);
37 per cent increase in the number of aircraft based at the airport (130 in 2015 to 178 in 2035)
90 per cent increase in the number of tie downs required (44 in 2015 to 84 in 2035)
35 per cent increase in land required for airport uses (45,137 square metres in 2015 to 61,078 square metres in 2035).
-Option one focuses on maintaining existing airport assets, with improvements for safety and security reasons. Runway rehabilitation, the construction of a new terminal building, a new gate and signage would cost an estimated $986,400.
-Option two would go farther, also adding new hangars along Tronson Road, a new taxiway and a dedicated helipad.
-Option 2.b suggests a similar plan, as well as lengthening the runway to 1,219.2 m (4,000 feet) by diverting Vernon Creek through a new culvert. Total cost of those improvements is estimated at $7,227,300.
-Option three includes all of the above improvements, plus the expansion of Apron 1 toward the east and the acquisition of a number of properties to the east of the airport, between Okanagan Landing and Tronson roads at an estimated cost of $11,063,300.
While no recommendations are made, planners warn of any runway expansion.
“Extension of the runway to 4,000 feet has a doubtful viability,” state the report's authors. “At an estimated $5.2 million, the runway extension represents a very large investment for the community, and such an investment should provide a very clear benefit. “Based on the economic impact analysis for various development scenarios, the runway extension offers only a marginal increase in economic activity and would have a detrimental impact on surrounding neighbourhoods, particularly with regard to noise and development potential. “The current runway length also meets the needs of approximately 97 per cent of aircraft movements at the airport, and would fulfil most of the airport's needs for the next 20 years.”
Figures show 130 aircraft were based at the airport in 2014, most single engine, general aviation used by private owners. Within commercial use aircraft, Kal Aviation operates two turbo jet aircrafts, Okanagan Skydive operates two aircraft, and Coldstream Helicopters and Advantage Helicopters operate three helicopters each, the report says.
Planners stress this is a preliminary document to allow council input. It also comes ahead of a Jan. 15 meeting with the Okanagan Indian Band (OKIB) to discuss the draft proposal. The draft plan includes estimates for anticipated demand for services and requirements over the next twenty years, including:
61 per cent in increase in aircraft movements (15,482 movements in 2015 to 24,980 in 2035)
36 per cent increase in fuel sales (535,825 litres in 2015 to 730,496 in 2035);
37 per cent increase in the number of aircraft based at the airport (130 in 2015 to 178 in 2035)
90 per cent increase in the number of tie downs required (44 in 2015 to 84 in 2035)
35 per cent increase in land required for airport uses (45,137 square metres in 2015 to 61,078 square metres in 2035).
Sunday, September 27, 2015
Vernon airport plan draws public feedback
Question of the Day:Vernon Morning Star
Should the City of Vernon continue to operate an airport?
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Sep 23, 2015 at 1:00 AM
Opinions about the future of Vernon’s airport range from a smooth approach to turbulence. About 60 people attended an open house on the city’s draft 20-year master airport plan. “Some would like to see development and some are concerned a runway extension will increase noise,” said Roy Nuriel, planning assistant. Each of the plan’s four options provides a different level of development, including airfield enhancements within the current airport site (hangars, helipad, terminal upgrade, apron and taxiway), a runway extension to 1,220 metres towards Okanagan Lake and optional eastward expansion of the airport. Option one with some facility enhancements but no runway extension would cost about $700,000, while option three has an extension and a $9 million price tag. Surveys were filled out by those at the input session. “Sixty per cent of the surveys would like to see the big plan (extension),” said Nuriel, adding that there is 40 per cent support for development among those who are filling out the survey online. One resident did not select any of the options. “I don’t feel there is any need for this money to be spent on the airport,” said Dave Lowry, who lives nearby.
“The small development that is being explained in option one seems to be a lot of money spent on a few buildings that will only supply housing for a very few people and aircraft. The option that requires the extension of the runway seems to be a foolish idea as we have an international airport just 25 minutes down the road.” Nuriel says all of the input is being considered. “We will analyze the results and see what we will recommend as staff to council.”Information is at www.vernon.ca/airportmasterplan.
-----------
http://www.vernon.ca/services/airport/masterplan/docs/Vernon-Regional-Airport-Development-Alternatives-Summary.pdf
Should the City of Vernon continue to operate an airport?
 |
| Results at 6:30 PM SUN FINAL. |
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Sep 23, 2015 at 1:00 AM
Opinions about the future of Vernon’s airport range from a smooth approach to turbulence. About 60 people attended an open house on the city’s draft 20-year master airport plan. “Some would like to see development and some are concerned a runway extension will increase noise,” said Roy Nuriel, planning assistant. Each of the plan’s four options provides a different level of development, including airfield enhancements within the current airport site (hangars, helipad, terminal upgrade, apron and taxiway), a runway extension to 1,220 metres towards Okanagan Lake and optional eastward expansion of the airport. Option one with some facility enhancements but no runway extension would cost about $700,000, while option three has an extension and a $9 million price tag. Surveys were filled out by those at the input session. “Sixty per cent of the surveys would like to see the big plan (extension),” said Nuriel, adding that there is 40 per cent support for development among those who are filling out the survey online. One resident did not select any of the options. “I don’t feel there is any need for this money to be spent on the airport,” said Dave Lowry, who lives nearby.
“The small development that is being explained in option one seems to be a lot of money spent on a few buildings that will only supply housing for a very few people and aircraft. The option that requires the extension of the runway seems to be a foolish idea as we have an international airport just 25 minutes down the road.” Nuriel says all of the input is being considered. “We will analyze the results and see what we will recommend as staff to council.”Information is at www.vernon.ca/airportmasterplan.
-----------
http://www.vernon.ca/services/airport/masterplan/docs/Vernon-Regional-Airport-Development-Alternatives-Summary.pdf
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Improvements coming to B.C. airports
News Release Victoria Monday, September 21, 2015 8:45 AM
The Government of B.C. is providing over $6 million in funding to B.C. community and regional airports this year, as part of the new B.C. Air Access Program. The program is part of B.C. on the Move, the Province’s new 10-year transportation plan. “Providing smaller and regional airports with funding support for infrastructure improvements was a common theme we heard during our B.C. on the Move consultations,” said Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Todd Stone. “The B.C. Air Access Program will help these airports make crucial upgrades to their infrastructure for safety, reliability and expansion purposes.”Through the B.C. Air Access Program, the ministry will cost share with public airports on projects such as lighting and navigational systems, terminal building expansion or upgrades, and runway improvements. These types of projects will allow airports to improve safety, accommodate larger aircrafts and more frequent flights, and further support the continuing growth of local and provincial economies. The ministry is investing $24 million over the next three years for the B.C. Air Access Program. (more)
---------
Improvements coming to B.C. airports
Projects receiving B.C. Air Access Program funding include:
South Cariboo Regional Airport (108 Mile): $26,250 for the purchase and installation of a new emergency generator.
Chilliwack Municipal Airport: $315,584 for the Culvert Extension and Rehabilitation project.
Creston Valley Regional Airport: $157,877 for upgrades to the runway lighting.
Grand Forks Municipal Airport: $45,000 for Beacon Site upgrades.
Langley Regional Airport: $287,025 to rehabilitate the taxiways and aprons.
Long Beach Airport: $1.27 million for runway lighting.
Squamish Airport: $123,000 to rehabilitate the taxiway and apron.
Northwest Regional Airport (Terrace-Kitimat): $4.42 million toward expansion of the airport facility.
Williams Lake Airport: $486,387 to rehabilitate the runway and taxiway.
Dawson Creek Regional Airport: $82,311 to replace the terminal roof, add CCTV to the grounds and replacing the secure key control access system.
Learn more:
For information on the B.C. Air Access program, go to: http://www.gov.bc.ca/BCAirAccessProgram
B.C. on the Move is available online at: http://engage.gov.bc.ca/transportationplan/
----------------
B.C. Air Access program
Eligible Projects
The British Columbia Air Access Program (BCAAP) considers applications from B.C. public airports under two categories — small rehabilitation and major projects.
Small Rehabilitation Project Considerations
Safety-related projects
BC Air Access Program share will not exceed 75% of eligible project costs
Projects are to be completed within one year of project approval
Major Project Considerations
Major safety and rehabilitation enhancements or projects that demonstrate significant economic benefits, are supported by a business case and have linkages to provincial strategies
BC Air Access Program share will not exceed 50% of eligible project costs
Submissions will be considered for multi-year projects. Project completion could take up to a maximum of three years to enable phasing of construction and funding.
Funding Partnerships
The BC Air Access Program encourages funding partnerships with local, regional and federal governments as well as agencies and private sector organizations.
For more information regarding third party funding and cost-sharing, see program guidelines.
Ministry of Transportation and InfrastructureBritish Columbia Air Access Program (BCAAP)Guidelines (June 1, 2015)
The Government of B.C. is providing over $6 million in funding to B.C. community and regional airports this year, as part of the new B.C. Air Access Program. The program is part of B.C. on the Move, the Province’s new 10-year transportation plan. “Providing smaller and regional airports with funding support for infrastructure improvements was a common theme we heard during our B.C. on the Move consultations,” said Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Todd Stone. “The B.C. Air Access Program will help these airports make crucial upgrades to their infrastructure for safety, reliability and expansion purposes.”Through the B.C. Air Access Program, the ministry will cost share with public airports on projects such as lighting and navigational systems, terminal building expansion or upgrades, and runway improvements. These types of projects will allow airports to improve safety, accommodate larger aircrafts and more frequent flights, and further support the continuing growth of local and provincial economies. The ministry is investing $24 million over the next three years for the B.C. Air Access Program. (more)
---------
Improvements coming to B.C. airports
Projects receiving B.C. Air Access Program funding include:
South Cariboo Regional Airport (108 Mile): $26,250 for the purchase and installation of a new emergency generator.
Chilliwack Municipal Airport: $315,584 for the Culvert Extension and Rehabilitation project.
Creston Valley Regional Airport: $157,877 for upgrades to the runway lighting.
Grand Forks Municipal Airport: $45,000 for Beacon Site upgrades.
Langley Regional Airport: $287,025 to rehabilitate the taxiways and aprons.
Long Beach Airport: $1.27 million for runway lighting.
Squamish Airport: $123,000 to rehabilitate the taxiway and apron.
Northwest Regional Airport (Terrace-Kitimat): $4.42 million toward expansion of the airport facility.
Williams Lake Airport: $486,387 to rehabilitate the runway and taxiway.
Dawson Creek Regional Airport: $82,311 to replace the terminal roof, add CCTV to the grounds and replacing the secure key control access system.
Learn more:
For information on the B.C. Air Access program, go to: http://www.gov.bc.ca/BCAirAccessProgram
B.C. on the Move is available online at: http://engage.gov.bc.ca/transportationplan/
----------------
B.C. Air Access program
Eligible Projects
The British Columbia Air Access Program (BCAAP) considers applications from B.C. public airports under two categories — small rehabilitation and major projects.
Small Rehabilitation Project Considerations
Safety-related projects
BC Air Access Program share will not exceed 75% of eligible project costs
Projects are to be completed within one year of project approval
Major Project Considerations
Major safety and rehabilitation enhancements or projects that demonstrate significant economic benefits, are supported by a business case and have linkages to provincial strategies
BC Air Access Program share will not exceed 50% of eligible project costs
Submissions will be considered for multi-year projects. Project completion could take up to a maximum of three years to enable phasing of construction and funding.
Funding Partnerships
The BC Air Access Program encourages funding partnerships with local, regional and federal governments as well as agencies and private sector organizations.
For more information regarding third party funding and cost-sharing, see program guidelines.
Ministry of Transportation and InfrastructureBritish Columbia Air Access Program (BCAAP)Guidelines (June 1, 2015)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)