Wednesday, August 19, 2009 | 2:56 PM PT CBC NEWS:
A Prince George, B.C., councillor has been charged with the unauthorized release of personal information after the CBC reported on a confidential report about the conduct of a senior RCMP officer last year.Coun. Brian Skakun calls the charges laid against him under B.C.'s Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act outrageous."This charge, the way I understand it, has never happened in the province of B.C., ever. And the resources and the time that went into this from the attorney general's office down to get me is absolutely mind-boggling," said Skakun.The confidential information was contained in a legal opinion presented to the city council in a closed-door session, but Skakun said the information was in the public domain well before that meeting.
Harassment allegation sparked report
The city had commissioned the report after an allegation of harassment was levelled against then-Supt. Dahl Chambers, the highest-ranking RCMP officer in the city at the time.The report outlined a romantic relationship between Chambers and a city employee responsible for overseeing civilian staff at the RCMP in Prince George. A city report concluded a relationship between top-ranking Prince George RCMP officer Dahl Chambers and a city employee responsible for overseeing civilian staff at the RCMP was a conflict of interest. (CBC) The report called that relationship a conflict of interest. Chambers later requested and was granted a transfer out of northern B.C.
CBC obtained the documents, reported on them, and posted them online, in August 2008. Skakun's first court appearance is set for Sept. 22, and he told CBC News he looks forward to clearing his name at trial. CBC senior producer Wayne Williams said it is CBC's policy not to comment on confidential sources.
---------------
According to the court document charging Skakun, the offense occurred "on or about the 18th day of August, 2008" and was a contravention of Section 30.4 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
It reads: 30.4 An employee, officer or director of a public body or an employee or associate of a service provider who has access, whether authorized or unauthorized, to personal information in the custody or control of a public body, must not disclose that information except as authorized under this Act.
According to officials, the charge does not bring with it a criminal record or jail time, assuming someone is found guilty of this infraction, and the maximum penalty allowed for the worst foreseeable abuse of the legislation is a $2,000 fine.
The act came into force on Oct. 4, 1993 and a year later it was amended to include municipal government.
No comments:
Post a Comment