Showing posts with label taxes 2009. Show all posts
Showing posts with label taxes 2009. Show all posts

Monday, March 29, 2010

Where Local municipalities Get their Tax Money (2009)

Click on Image to enlarge:

Local Government Statistics

These charts illustrate the property taxes imposed on the various classes of property in the Municipalities. (Vernon, Coldstream,Armstrong, Spall, Enderby & Lumby)

The Percent of total taxes paid by Residents (From 58% to 86%) as compared to Business and Light Industry varies throughout the region.

The variance on a $100,000 property in the various classes (Residential, Farm, Business, Light and heavy Industry) is revealing of the varied community property class value ranges.

**The Regional District taxes on the $100,000 cheat sheet are the actual rates and ratios but the extensions are made on the bases of the Regional Taxes being charged on both lands and improvements. This is not the case for some of the major functions at NORD- namely Multiplex , performing Arts and Parks which are based on Improvements only while the SIR program are charged on Land only. This can skew the figures shown for the final total taxes on the property. Consequently these figures are representative figures and will vary according to the land and improvement components of an individual property.

Saturday, June 06, 2009

It’s property tax time again

By Dave Ellis - Vernon Morning Star Published: June 06, 2009 12:00 PM

It’s property tax time and your notice is in the mail. It’s an interesting time, as I often hear people complain that the assessment notice is too low, and that their home is worth more. Keep in mind that your property tax is based on what the province thinks it should be assessed at. So a lower valuation is better. On my notice, I see $2.10 per $1,000 of value for the school tax portion of the property tax. Other charges are levied the same way, as dollar or cents per $1,000 of appraised value. B.C. uses an ad valorem (“based on value”) system of property taxation. Only real property value (land and buildings) is taxed. The value of personal property such as cars, jewelry and furniture is not taxed. The property assessment and taxation system in B.C. is a two-step process involving B.C. Assessment and the various tax authorities. B.C. Assessment determines the classification, value and exemption status of property.

Tax authorities then apply their tax rates to assessments. This determines how the tax burden will be shared among all property owners — residential, commercial, industrial, farm, etc. Property tax provides approximately 40 per cent of local government revenue in Canada and is the major source of revenue controlled by local government. This market value is determined by following generally accepted appraisal principles. Each year the assessor takes into account location, size, topography, shape, replacement cost, age, condition, rental income and sales of comparable properties in the area, as well as any other factors that might affect the property’s value, to determine what the property would sell for. The market value of property is recorded on the annual assessment roll. Market value for assessment purposes is the price an unencumbered property would sell for on July 1 of the preceding year if a reasonable amount of time is allowed to find a purchaser. On the flip side of the notice is information on payment options — how to appeal (if you think the valuation is too high) and a rather short paragraph entitled tax deferment.

Let’s look at that just a little closer. If you are age 55 or over in 2008, you can apply to defer the taxation of your property tax. It essentially becomes a loan from the province at a rate that is never more than two per cent less than the prime rate that the province borrows money at. Today that borrowing rate is pegged at 3.5 per cent( which makes this years deferment interest rate 1.50 per cent). You can’t borrow anywhere else at that rate. So, if you are 55 years old or over, you need to consider this offer. If you have an outstanding loan, credit card, mortgage or even a line of credit, it makes more sense to pay down those loans, and defer your property tax. New this year is the financial hardship rules which allow homeowners experiencing cash flow problems caused by the recession or unemployment issues to apply for the program as well, regardless of age.

If you don’t have any loans, it can still be used where the source of your funds is highly taxable. Let’s say you make a habit of withdrawing $5,000 a year from your RRSP to pay the property tax. By the time you pay tax on the $5000, you are left with $3,500 to pay the property tax. Why not let your RRSP continue to compound? If you have investments that you count on to earn the $3,500 (after income tax), to pay the property tax, you would need a capital account of approx $200,000 to earn that from current interest rates. From a number of different perspectives ,it makes sense to take up the offer. Yes, the province puts a lien on your property, and they want you to have at least 25 per cent equity in the home’s assessed value (and only 15 per cent equity under the financial hardship rules).

Lets say you have a home you think is valued at $500,000 and have a line of credit with the bank for $200,000. Whether you have written cheques against that $200,000 borrowing power or not, the $200,000 LOC is a registered lien. Now, lets also suppose that the assessment notice arrives for a value of $430,000. The province will look at your current loan, the $200,000 and the current assessed value of $430,000, and see that you still have $230,000 of equity value, or 53 per cent. So you qualify for the tax deferment.

What’s the downside? When you eventually sell your home, the province must be paid back the tax deferred, plus any simple interest charges. You have in effect lowered the net you receive. You have lowered the estate value of the property. If estate valuation is your concern , you might consider how much life insurance you can buy for $3,500 a year. Once you sign up and are accepted for the deferment program, you don’t have to defer every year, and can pay back whenever you feel like it. At two per cent below the B.C. prime rate, I think they will find a few takers. For more information, both the website and toll free telephone numbers are on your property tax notice.

Dave Ellis is a certified financial planner and a fellow of the Canadian Securities Institute. He is a vice-president at RBC Dominion Securities in Vernon.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

City more than $3M in the black

Wayne Moore - Jun 2, 2009 CASTANET:

The City of Kelowna has a budget surplus of nearly $3.1 million for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. Special Projects Manager, Lynn Walter, says the 2008 surplus amounts to 3.5% of the total 2008 tax demand. "The city is not allowed to budget for a deficit, so we try and budget for a surplus less than 5% of taxation," says Walter. Walter told council Monday three main areas contributed to the surplus, including $1.5 million in higher than anticipated investment income, $700,000 in savings from Works, Utilities and Engineering projects and $800,000 in savings in salaries and wages. "The report also explains where surpluses are being expropriated to as recommended by the audit committee. It should be noted those recommended appropriations are consistent with the 10-year capital plan and the 2009 financial plan."

Walter says funds will be distributed as following:
  • $95,000 - General Fund Surplus
  • $600,000 - Arterial Roads Reserve
  • $100,000 - Non-Arterial Roads
  • $500,000 - Snow Removal
  • $400,000 - Civic Facilities
  • $100,000 - RCMP Building
  • $500,000 - Parks Purchase and Development
  • $400,000 - Off-Road Bikeway
  • $200,000 - Financial Major Systems
  • $200,000 - Fringe Benefit Load.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Coldstream taxes lower than Vernon !


My fellow blogger Coldstreamer had an interesting comparison of taxes for a property in Coldstream when compared to the same valued Property in Vernon. (Click on link for full details.) Compare your Coldstream taxes to City of Vernon taxes!

He has now updated the tax comparison to include the 2009 tax year.

His calculations are that for a house valued at $457,000 ( with Land at $260,000 and Improvements at $197,000) that:
  • 2008 Municipal Taxes would be 41% Lower in Coldstream and total taxes would be 12.36% Lower in Coldstream. ($ difference on total Taxes would be $ 295.71)
  • 2009 Municipal Taxes would be 43% Lower in Coldstream and total taxes would be 13.28% Lower in Coldstream. ($ difference on total Taxes would be $ 331.25)
-----------------------
You can use the Vernon City tax calculator to calculate the taxes for any property in Vernon and then use the tax rates in Coldstream from the tax comparison sheet to compare taxes.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Municipal portion of taxes are almost 41% lower in Coldstream than in Vernon

My fellow blogger Coldstreamer has an interesting comparison of taxes for a property in Coldstream when compared to the same valued Property in Vernon. (Click on link for full details.)

Compare your Coldstream taxes to City of Vernon taxes!
Have you ever wondered how much you taxes would be if your Coldstream property was located in the City of Vernon? Wonder no more! You can actually calculate it and compare the results to your 2008 and, once you received your current tax notice, to your 2009 Coldstream property taxes.

Basically, the Municipal portion of taxes are almost 41% lower in Coldstream than in Vernon. In 2008. $311.69 Lower for the $457,000 Property in Coldstream.

2009 Comparison will be revealed when Coldstreamer gets his 2009 tax notice.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Law of Unexpected Consequences

2 properties side by side with identical land values but with different improvements (House Values) Who would you expect to pay the higher municipal increase both in $ increase and %age Increase? (All figures from City of Vernon Tax Calculator.)

By the way if you add $100,000 to the improvements of the higher price property the $amount of municipal tax increase this year will decrease to $18.86 and %age increase will be 1.8%. Adding $200,000 would decrease the amount of municipal tax increase to a minus $16.08 and an percentage decrease for municipal taxes of minus 1.1%.

Vernon property valued at $347,000 (Land 204,000) (Improvements $143,000).
2008
2009
Difference
Change
Assessed Value 347,000
347,000
0
0.0%








Tax Levies






School $729.29
$742.68
$13.39
1.8%
Municipal $810.19
$874.82
$64.64
8.0%
Library $50.66
$54.17
$3.50
6.9%
Regional District $350.08
$333.27
$-16.81
-4.8%
BC Assessment $21.34
$22.24
$0.90
4.2%
MFA $0.07
$0.07
$0.00
0.0%
Hospital $61.94
$64.37
$2.43
3.9%
Estimated Tax Levy $2,023.57
$2,091.62
$68.05
3.4%

Vernon property valued at $378,000 (Land 204,000) (Improvements $174,000).

2008
2009
Difference
Change
Assessed Value 378,000
378,000
0
0.0%








Tax Levies






School $794.44
$809.03
$14.59
1.8%
Municipal $899.26
$953.07
$53.80
6.0%
Library $55.19
$59.01
$3.82
6.9%
Regional District $415.05
$397.16
$-17.89
-4.3%
BC Assessment $23.25
$24.23
$0.98
4.2%
MFA $0.08
$0.08
$0.00
0.0%
Hospital $67.47
$70.12
$2.65
3.9%
Estimated Tax Levy $2,254.74
$2,312.69
$57.95
2.6%

Monday, May 11, 2009

Property Tax Calculator (VERNON 2009)

The Property value used for Comparative Purposes only is the Vernon Average House for 2009 of $414,406. ($196,843 land and $217,563 for Improvements)

The City of Vernon's tax Calculator is now on line. Both residents and businesses can put in their property values to ascertain their tax situation for 2009.

RESIDENTIAL HOUSE in City of VERNON (ROC)

The estimated values are only valid for residential properties (Class 01).


2008
2009
Difference
Change
Assessed Value 414,406
414,406
0
0.0%








Tax Levies






School $870.96
$886.95
$16.00
1.8%
Municipal $1,010.43
$1,044.99
$34.56
3.4%
Library $60.50
$64.69
$4.19
6.9%
Regional District $504.59
$485.60
$-18.99
-3.8%
BC Assessment $25.49
$26.56
$1.08
4.2%
MFA $0.08
$0.08
$0.00
0.0%
Hospital $73.97
$76.87
$2.90
3.9%
Estimated Tax Levy $2,546.02
$2,585.75
$39.74
1.6%


RESIDENTIAL HOUSE in Okanagan Landing

The estimated values are only valid for residential properties (Class 01).


2008
2009
Difference
Change
Assessed Value 414,406
414,406
0
0.0%








Tax Levies






School $870.96
$886.95
$16.00
1.8%
Municipal $923.16
$1,044.99
$121.83
13.2%
Library $60.50
$64.69
$4.19
6.9%
Regional District $504.59
$485.60
$-18.99
-3.8%
BC Assessment $25.49
$26.56
$1.08
4.2%
MFA $0.08
$0.08
$0.00
0.0%
Hospital $73.97
$76.87
$2.90
3.9%
Estimated Tax Levy $2,458.75
$2,585.75
$127.00
5.2%

Monday, April 27, 2009

Update on City Taxes for 2009

I had originally posted a Cheatsheet for 2009 taxes. There I had posted mill rates for both Residential and Business taxes for the City's portion of taxes in 2009.

The Rates bylaw received 3 readings at April 14 Council Meeting and will probably received final reading at the Next Council meeting. The Mill rate Changes from my original cheetsheet are fractionally higher and were the result of using the final assessments totals for 2009 that were reduced slightly from 2008 assessments totals. (despite the Provincial freeze. ) This does NOT figure out your School taxes, Nord Taxes, Hospital taxes or Library and taxes for MFA and BC assessment or any specified areas taxes which all appeared on your 2008 tax bill. (Rates will be finalized at next council meeting)

To calculate your city taxes for residential purposes:
2.51913 times your total property assessment divided by 1000. PLUS
.0048 times your total improvements only divided by 1000.

To calculate your city taxes for business purposes:
7.6865 times your total property assessment divided by 1000. PLUS
.0146 times your total improvements only divided by 1000.

  • Compare it to your 2008 tax bill for the sections "General City taxes AND Fire Protection (Add the two totals together to get 2008 taxes)
  • The difference is how much the City Part of your taxes will go up or down for 2009.
-----------------------
For example a Residential property assessed at $546,000 with land valued at $232,000 and improvements at $314,000 would have the following City Taxes:
2.51913 x 546,000/1000 = $1375.44 PLUS
.0048 x 314,000/1000 = $1.51
TOTAL City Taxes 2009 = $1376.95

In 2008 this property paid $1,356.33 in City Taxes
This is a 1.52 % Increase for THIS PROPERTY. ($20.62)
------------------------------
Tax Caveat:
Every property is effected by the tax rates in a different manner and is dependent usually on the amount that its assessment is up as compared to the average assessment increase. As the Province froze assessments this year (in most cases) this should not be a major factor in this years calculation . The major difference this year is how much Land you have in comparison to the average Land component of the average property. (The average 2008 $418,676 property has 35.78% Land and 64.22% Improvements) As fire taxes will now be charged on Land also your taxes will rise or fall dependent on your deviation from the average.
------------------------

The City will be posting a tax calculator on their website so you can compare your tax increase or decrease. Until then the foregoing manual calculation method will have to suffice.

Thursday, April 02, 2009

TransLink raises property taxes to fund 2009 budget

CBC NEWS:

Metro Vancouver homeowners and businesses will have to pay more property taxes to fund the 2009 budget for TransLink, the B.C. South Coast transportation authority. Homeowners will be levied $36.77 per $100,000 of assessed value, TransLink announced Wednesday. So the TransLink portion of property taxes for a home with an assessed value of $600,000 will be about $220 in 2009 — a rise of $16, or 7.8 per cent, from the previous year. The tax hike is aimed at funding the "ongoing operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the region's major roads and transit network," TransLink said in a news release. "The increase in TransLink's portion of residential property taxes represents a rise in the overall amount for an average residential property of less than one per cent," it said. Business property taxes will increase by an average $59 — or two per cent — over 2008 amounts, based on an assessed value of $1.7 million. The business property tax rate will be $172.96 per $100,000 of assessed value. In total, property taxes will contribute more than $263 million toward TransLink's 2009 budget of $1 billion — an increase of three per cent over 2008, according to the news release.

-----------------

Don Quixote Note: The above info would indicate that the Business Tax Ratio is 4.7038 for Vancouver (172.96/36.77). At present Vernon's sits at 3.0917 for the 2009 tax season.

Last year (2008) Vancouver's business tax ratio was 5.07579 as was their Light Industry ration. Vernon's light industry ratio was 3.46072. However the light Industry Class and the Hevey Industry Class is getting a 50% reduction in school taxes in 2009. Premier Campbell announced on October 22, 2008 that 50% of all school property taxes will be rebated to light and heavy industry annually, to lower their costs and help them grow.

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Property taxes could rise despite freeze on assessment levels

CBC NEWS:
The B.C. government's promise to freeze property assessment levels does not mean property taxes will be frozen this year, the Union of B.C. Municipalities said Tuesday. The 2009 property assessment notice will be mailed out to property owners across the province this week. Freezing assessment levels is part of Premier Gordon Campbell's 10-point economic plan announced last November. But that doesn't prevent cities and towns from raising their mill rates, said Robert Hobson, president of the Union of B.C. Municipalities. "What you pay in municipal taxes is based on your comparative assessment increase or decrease compared to other people within your municipality," Hobson said. "So your assessments may be frozen, but your taxes certainly are not frozen. Municipalities adjust their tax rates based on the overall value of assessment in the municipality."

BC Assessment, which provides current actual value assessments for tax purposes, is setting the rates for this year at either the 2007 or the 2008 levels — whichever is lower. "It practically means that for most people, their assessment hasn't changed from last year," assessor Brian Hawkins said. "It's mostly a way to provide stability in the assessments, and if the governments had not done anything, people would be receiving assessments right now, where the assessment is between eight and 12 per cent higher than last year," he said. The freeze applies only to the 2009 tax year.

Opposition NDP finance critic Bruce Ralston said the freeze will do little more than confuse taxpayers. Katie Josephson, a spokesperson for the City of Victoria, said property taxes could still go up, depending on how much a municipality needs for projects and services. "There's no direct correlation between your assessed property value and your tax rate. Taxes are set by council when they set their budget each year," she said

Your Assesment in the North Okanagan

http://www.bcassessment.bc.ca/news/index.asp
This indicates the average selling price increase for June 30, 2008 when compared to June 30,2007 for the NORTH OKANAGAN would be 13.02%.

I have sent an e-mail to the Local Office to get a breakdown by area (Vernon, Coldstream etc.) which would make a better relative comparision.

You can take your 2009 assessment and compare it to your 2008 assessment and calculate how much it has gone up. When you make this calculation you can ascertain if you went up more or less than the average and decide whether you are better off under this FROZEN assessment system.

This is an inaccurate indicator as we are comparing sales to assessment and this is for the whole region but it is the best we have for now.

I have also asked the Local Assessor to give us the figures indicating the average assessment increase of 2008 over 2007 by area (Vernon Coldstream etc.) and if I get them I will make a more valid comparision.

Monday, September 08, 2008

Pre-budget public input tour skips Kelowna and Vernon

Kelowna Daily Courier:

A government committee gathering public input in advance of the 2009 provincial budget will visit 16 B.C. cities, but not Kelowna or Vernon. Only one stop in the Okanagan is planned, in Penticton, but the 10-member committee will hold six hearings in Metro Vancouver, as well as sessions in small towns such as Kitimat and Fort St. John. “We are trying to spread things out, so that, over time, we‘ll visit as many B.C. communities as possible,” the committee‘s chairman, Randy Hawes (Liberal – Maple Ridge-Mission), said Wednesday. “The travel schedule is hectic, and we can only visit so many communities in a year,” he said. “This year, our stop in the Okanagan is in Penticton.”

One consideration was that this year‘s Union of British Columbia Municipalities convention is being held in Penticton Sept. 22-26. Having the budget hearing in Penticton on Sept. 23 could allow elected officials from many towns and cities to make presentations to the committee, which consists of six Liberal MLAs and four NDP MLAs. Similar pre-budget hearings have been held four times in Kelowna, and once in Vernon.

Last year, almost 6,000 British Columbians made presentations to committee members, offering advice on what they‘d like to see included in the budget. “It‘s very important that all citizens of the province have the opportunity to participate in the budget-making process, and to indicate what their priorities are,” said committee deputy chair Bruce Ralston (NDP – Surrey Whalley).
Written submissions through leg.bc.ca/budgetconsultations must be sent in before Oct. 17.
--------------------------
Don Quixote Note: As many of Vernon's UBCM resolution could affect the budget it is imperative that those chosen to go to UBCM are prepared to make a full presentation of these ideas to the budget hearings on the 23rd.

No word on who will be representing Vernon at UBCM but as Coun. Cunningham and Baumbrough will be tied up at a conference in Alberta that leaves only 5 council members to choose from. A councillor versed in the intricacies of Provincial Financing and taxation will be needed to lead this team. Who will make the team ?

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Hydro taxation unfair to CSRD

Salmon arm Observer

Regional districts are calling on the B.C. government for fair compensation by taxation of BC Hydro properties. The Columbia Shuswap Regional District has put its support behind a resolution from the Regional District of Central Kootenay, calling on the Union of B.C. Municipalities to negotiate with the province an agreement that would see regional districts fairly compensated with grants-in-lieu of property taxes from transmission and distribution lines. "Everybody should pay their fair share of taxes, including BC Hydro, and we've paid a really big price in the CSRD and other parts of the province," commented Golden director Jim Doyle at this month's board meeting. "The generation facilities and these reservoirs have taken up thousands of acres of land." But Doyle and other directors weren't satisfied with just transmission and distribution lines. Revelstoke director Mark McKee suggested compensation should also come for hydro generation stations. South Shuswap Area C director Ted Bacigalupo added transformer stations. Area F director Denis Delisle warned, however, that additions to the resolution might water it down. "The regional directors of British Columbia… have worked on this for quite a few years now, just on transmission lines… I think if we just deal with this issue and bring up that later," said Delisle. Revelstoke-Columbia director Loni Parker reiterated the difficulty the regional districts have had in dealing with BC Hydro on this issue. "They've effectively sidestepped every effort local governments have put in to receive fair compensation," said Parker of the Crown corporation. Doyle and Parker noted how hydro projects have resulted in the loss of forestry jobs as well as 7,000 acres of farm land south of Revelstoke. After voting in support the Kootenay resolution, the board approved an additional resolution that compensation should by paid for all BC Hydro facilities.