Posted on 5/25/2015 by Pete McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM
It may be easier for Greater Vernon to have a governance review -- if a local business group gets its way. The Greater Vernon Chamber of Commerce has got support from the BC Chamber delegates for its resolution calling on the province to take a more active role in regional governance reviews. “Provincial legislation is quite limiting in allowing for the exploration of different governance models that could achieve positive results for business in streamlining regulatory and development processes among neighbouring local government jurisdictions, says Matt Davidson, chair of GVCC’s policy advisory committee. “We appreciate that there are pros and cons related to different governance models but those can’t be examined if there is unwillingness by local governments to explore those ideas or if there is a lack of financial resources from the Province to undertake such reviews.” Chamber general manager Dan Rogers says they want changes that would allow the Province to initiate a study even if only one jurisdiction is interested in exploring the business case for changes. Vernon supported such a review last year, but the province wouldn't proceed as no other local communities backed it. BC chambers of commerce are holding their AGM in Prince George this week.
Showing posts with label future governance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label future governance. Show all posts
Monday, May 25, 2015
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Area restructuring raises eyebrows
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Mar 29, 2015 at 1:00 AM
The prospect of Greater Vernon having two MLAs is raising eyebrows among local officials. The B.C. Electoral Boundaries Commission has issued recommendations for the 2017 provincial election. It suggests removing the Swan Lake area and a portion of the BX from Vernon-Monashee and putting it in the Shuswap constituency. “It sounds a bit odd to carve off pieces of Greater Vernon,” said Bob Fleming, BX-Swan Lake director. The proposed electoral area district boundary would follow the Vernon municipal boundary around Swan Lake and Silver Star Foothills to the Spallumcheen boundary. The Swan Lake commercial corridor along Highway 97 would join the Shuswap constituency as would Old Kamloops Road (except for the Blue Jay subdivision). Silver Star Road would be the boundary between the two constituencies — meaning the BX fire hall would be in the Shuswap but BX Elementary would be in Vernon-Monashee. All of the regional district’s BX-Swan Lake electoral area would be in the Shuswap but BX-Silver Star would be divided. “We will have to sit down and see what it means for residents,” said Mike Macnabb, BX-Silver Star director. Silver Star Foothills, which is part of the City of Vernon, will remain in Vernon-Monashee. Fleming says the four Greater Vernon jurisdictions are linked over issues such as water and two provincial boundaries could create challenges. “If we’re dealing with the provincial government, we could deal with two MLAs related to the Greater Vernon area,” he said. Akbal Mund, Vernon mayor, has concerns about the electoral areas having an MLA distinct from the city. “What happens if in the future, the Swan Lake corridor becomes part of Vernon?” he said. The B.C. Electoral Boundaries Commission says there’s a need to adjust boundaries because Vernon-Monashee is the most populated constituency in the region while Shuswap is the second smallest. “Public input recommended that if changes were needed to balance the population in this area, we could consider moving the community of Swan Lake from Vernon-Monashee to Shuswap without reducing the effectiveness of representation,” states the commission in its report. Residents are being asked to review the preliminary recommendations and provide input online or by e-mail by May 26. Public hearings will also be held across B.C. “We then will analyze this input over the summer before producing our final proposals,” states the commission, adding that the deadline to present a final report to the Legislature is Sept. 25. Eric Foster, Vernon-Monashee MLA, supports the commission’s initial findings. “I don’t think as far as service to the public, it will make a lot of difference. We will still look after them,” he said. Greg Kyllo, Shuswap MLA, doesn’t have any concerns about his constituency expanding south if he is re-elected in 2017. “If it includes Swan Lake, it just adds about three miles,” he said.
The prospect of Greater Vernon having two MLAs is raising eyebrows among local officials. The B.C. Electoral Boundaries Commission has issued recommendations for the 2017 provincial election. It suggests removing the Swan Lake area and a portion of the BX from Vernon-Monashee and putting it in the Shuswap constituency. “It sounds a bit odd to carve off pieces of Greater Vernon,” said Bob Fleming, BX-Swan Lake director. The proposed electoral area district boundary would follow the Vernon municipal boundary around Swan Lake and Silver Star Foothills to the Spallumcheen boundary. The Swan Lake commercial corridor along Highway 97 would join the Shuswap constituency as would Old Kamloops Road (except for the Blue Jay subdivision). Silver Star Road would be the boundary between the two constituencies — meaning the BX fire hall would be in the Shuswap but BX Elementary would be in Vernon-Monashee. All of the regional district’s BX-Swan Lake electoral area would be in the Shuswap but BX-Silver Star would be divided. “We will have to sit down and see what it means for residents,” said Mike Macnabb, BX-Silver Star director. Silver Star Foothills, which is part of the City of Vernon, will remain in Vernon-Monashee. Fleming says the four Greater Vernon jurisdictions are linked over issues such as water and two provincial boundaries could create challenges. “If we’re dealing with the provincial government, we could deal with two MLAs related to the Greater Vernon area,” he said. Akbal Mund, Vernon mayor, has concerns about the electoral areas having an MLA distinct from the city. “What happens if in the future, the Swan Lake corridor becomes part of Vernon?” he said. The B.C. Electoral Boundaries Commission says there’s a need to adjust boundaries because Vernon-Monashee is the most populated constituency in the region while Shuswap is the second smallest. “Public input recommended that if changes were needed to balance the population in this area, we could consider moving the community of Swan Lake from Vernon-Monashee to Shuswap without reducing the effectiveness of representation,” states the commission in its report. Residents are being asked to review the preliminary recommendations and provide input online or by e-mail by May 26. Public hearings will also be held across B.C. “We then will analyze this input over the summer before producing our final proposals,” states the commission, adding that the deadline to present a final report to the Legislature is Sept. 25. Eric Foster, Vernon-Monashee MLA, supports the commission’s initial findings. “I don’t think as far as service to the public, it will make a lot of difference. We will still look after them,” he said. Greg Kyllo, Shuswap MLA, doesn’t have any concerns about his constituency expanding south if he is re-elected in 2017. “If it includes Swan Lake, it just adds about three miles,” he said.
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
More Governance Talk At Vernon Council
Written by Peter McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM Tuesday, 11 March 2014 04:36
The Greater Vernon governance issue may not be on any local ballots this fall. Vernon could still ask its residents if they support an amalgamation study, but councillor Bob Spiers says it's clear Electoral areas B and C, and Coldstream won't be including it, even though he thinks they should. "I just wanted to make sure everyone knows that it won't be going as a referendum question in the area, and I guess we'll have to decide if we put it out for our people (Vernon residents) in the next five or six months," Spiers told the media. Spiers still thinks there would be merits for their partners to put the question to their residents in the November elections. "And I wish Areas B and C would give their citizens the same opportunity to see if they (the politician reps) truly represent their constituency, but they're not going to," Spiers adds. A letter to the city from the Area B and C reps Bob Fleming and Mike Macnabb, says they don't support an amalgamation study, or spending tax dollars and staff time to put it on the ballot, preferring to remain with the current governance structure.
---------
KISSFM POLL: RESULTS FINAL
The Greater Vernon governance issue may not be on any local ballots this fall. Vernon could still ask its residents if they support an amalgamation study, but councillor Bob Spiers says it's clear Electoral areas B and C, and Coldstream won't be including it, even though he thinks they should. "I just wanted to make sure everyone knows that it won't be going as a referendum question in the area, and I guess we'll have to decide if we put it out for our people (Vernon residents) in the next five or six months," Spiers told the media. Spiers still thinks there would be merits for their partners to put the question to their residents in the November elections. "And I wish Areas B and C would give their citizens the same opportunity to see if they (the politician reps) truly represent their constituency, but they're not going to," Spiers adds. A letter to the city from the Area B and C reps Bob Fleming and Mike Macnabb, says they don't support an amalgamation study, or spending tax dollars and staff time to put it on the ballot, preferring to remain with the current governance structure.
---------
KISSFM POLL: RESULTS FINAL
| Do you think the benefits of an amalgamation study should still be put to local voters this fall? | ||
|---|---|---|
| yes | ||
| 25- | 54.3% | |
| no | ||
| 21 | 45.7 % | |
| Number of Voters | : 46 |
Friday, February 14, 2014
Master water plan generates council debate
by Jennifer Smith - Vernon Morning Star posted Feb 14, 2014 at 1:00 AM
Concerns are leaking out over Greater Vernon’s Master Water Plan. Before residents go to referendum in November to borrow $70 million for water upgrades, several Coldstream politicians say the plan needs to be reviewed.Coun. Gyula Kiss is demanding that the current proposed master water plan be reviewed by an independent consultant. Kiss, who has long studied and followed the water plan, says there are inconsistencies with the plan. Although a peer review of the plan appears to be on the books, Kiss urges that it needs to be an independent review. “We are already paying $2 million a year for that plant up there (Duteau Creek),” said Kiss. “Now they want $26.5.”
Petition rejected
Coldstream has come up with an official response to a petition aimed at investigating the potential of amalgamation. Council unanimously approved a motion Tuesday evening in response to the Greater Vernon Governance Society proposal to support a review by local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine Vernon, Coldstream and Areas B and C. “Council is not in support of this proposal to amalgamate as it is not in the best interests of Coldstream residents in both measurable objective terms such as tax rate, infrastructure deficit per person, municipal debt per person, cost of protective services per person, additional costs that are presently provincial responsibility and subjective terms such as efficiency, responsiveness, representation and sense of community,” reads the motion. “And further that it is council’s view that an amalgamation study only serves as a step toward developing a plan to amalgamate as implied by the petition statement and is therefore not supported by council.”
Concerns are leaking out over Greater Vernon’s Master Water Plan. Before residents go to referendum in November to borrow $70 million for water upgrades, several Coldstream politicians say the plan needs to be reviewed.Coun. Gyula Kiss is demanding that the current proposed master water plan be reviewed by an independent consultant. Kiss, who has long studied and followed the water plan, says there are inconsistencies with the plan. Although a peer review of the plan appears to be on the books, Kiss urges that it needs to be an independent review. “We are already paying $2 million a year for that plant up there (Duteau Creek),” said Kiss. “Now they want $26.5.”
Petition rejected
Coldstream has come up with an official response to a petition aimed at investigating the potential of amalgamation. Council unanimously approved a motion Tuesday evening in response to the Greater Vernon Governance Society proposal to support a review by local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine Vernon, Coldstream and Areas B and C. “Council is not in support of this proposal to amalgamate as it is not in the best interests of Coldstream residents in both measurable objective terms such as tax rate, infrastructure deficit per person, municipal debt per person, cost of protective services per person, additional costs that are presently provincial responsibility and subjective terms such as efficiency, responsiveness, representation and sense of community,” reads the motion. “And further that it is council’s view that an amalgamation study only serves as a step toward developing a plan to amalgamate as implied by the petition statement and is therefore not supported by council.”
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Coldstream Officially Declines Study Request
Written by Glen Morrison 107.5 KISSFM Wednesday, 12 February 2014 17:08
Coldstream has formally said no to any further governance studies after being asked to sign on by Vernon. Mayor Jim Garlick says council approved a written response to the city by unanimous vote. He says they feel the proposal wouldn't be in the best interests of the municipality and are detailing all the information available. "In council's view, an amalgamation study would only serve as a step to developing a plan to amalgamate as implied by the (Greater Vernon Governance Society's) petition statement, and therefore is not supported by council," said Garlick. Garlick says all the information they've based their decision on is now posted to the district web site, including the 1991 Sussex study which he says is still valid if today's numbers are inserted. "And to be honest, once that study was done and did not move forward, all we saw was a lot of fighting from the city of Vernon and the surrounding area," says Garlick.
Coldstream has formally said no to any further governance studies after being asked to sign on by Vernon. Mayor Jim Garlick says council approved a written response to the city by unanimous vote. He says they feel the proposal wouldn't be in the best interests of the municipality and are detailing all the information available. "In council's view, an amalgamation study would only serve as a step to developing a plan to amalgamate as implied by the (Greater Vernon Governance Society's) petition statement, and therefore is not supported by council," said Garlick. Garlick says all the information they've based their decision on is now posted to the district web site, including the 1991 Sussex study which he says is still valid if today's numbers are inserted. "And to be honest, once that study was done and did not move forward, all we saw was a lot of fighting from the city of Vernon and the surrounding area," says Garlick.
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Mayor Wants Governance Issue 'Put To Bed'
Written by Peter McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM Thursday, 30 January 2014 17:00
Vernon residents may still have a say on the local governance issue this fall, even though prospects for a study look dim. Mayor Rob Sawatzky tells Kiss FM, it wouldn't cost anything to ask residents if they support an amalgamation study, as it would part of the municipal elections. "And it really is the only way to put it to bed from our point of view," says Sawatzky. Vernon council has already passed a motion to put the governance question (if a study should be held) on the ballot this fall, and is encouraging its regional partners to do the same. However, if the vote passed, Sawatzky doesn't think the city should fund it. "Why would a jurisdiction fund a study that is not likely to show cost savings, and doesn't have a partner, and can't move forward? It's not particularly logical." MLA Eric Foster said earlier this week the province won't fund the study, unless all the local jurisdictions agree to it. Coldstream and the directors for electoral areas B and C have rejected taking part in a study.
Vernon residents may still have a say on the local governance issue this fall, even though prospects for a study look dim. Mayor Rob Sawatzky tells Kiss FM, it wouldn't cost anything to ask residents if they support an amalgamation study, as it would part of the municipal elections. "And it really is the only way to put it to bed from our point of view," says Sawatzky. Vernon council has already passed a motion to put the governance question (if a study should be held) on the ballot this fall, and is encouraging its regional partners to do the same. However, if the vote passed, Sawatzky doesn't think the city should fund it. "Why would a jurisdiction fund a study that is not likely to show cost savings, and doesn't have a partner, and can't move forward? It's not particularly logical." MLA Eric Foster said earlier this week the province won't fund the study, unless all the local jurisdictions agree to it. Coldstream and the directors for electoral areas B and C have rejected taking part in a study.
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
District of Coldstream has link to Governance Documents
The Issue of Amalgamation and Governance in the Greater Vernon Area
The following reports have been compiled by the District of Coldstream regarding current and past documents impacting the governance of the Greater Vernon area. Please check this webpage again for further updates.
Greater Vernon Restructure Study 1991 by Sussex Consultants Ltd. (5MB PDF)
District of Coldstream 2012 Annual Report (8MB PDF)
City of Vernon 2012 Annual Report (15MB PDF)
The following reports have been compiled by the District of Coldstream regarding current and past documents impacting the governance of the Greater Vernon area. Please check this webpage again for further updates.
Greater Vernon Restructure Study 1991 by Sussex Consultants Ltd. (5MB PDF)
District of Coldstream 2012 Annual Report (8MB PDF)
City of Vernon 2012 Annual Report (15MB PDF)
Province Won't Review Coldstream Council's Conduct
Written by Peter McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM Wednesday, 29 January 2014 12:02
The group pushing for a governance study for Greater Vernon is upset at Coldstream council, but the BC government won't be taking action. The Greater Vernon Governance Society issued a news release today, saying it had asked BC's Community Minister to review Coldstream council's conduct, accusing the elected reps of having a "predetermined decision" and personal biases against a study looking into the pros and cons of unification or amalgamation. Vernon-Monashee MLA Eric Foster spoke with senior government reps from that ministry about the request today. "The opinion is the Coldstream council didn't do anything in contravention to the Local Government Act, so that's the end of the conversation for us," says Foster. Foster says if Coldstream had done something contrary to the act, there could have been a discussion, but he says that doesn't appear to be the case. On Tuesday, Foster said the province won't be funding a study into the governance issue, as requested by Vernon council and the governance society, unless all jurisdictions want one. Coldstream and the electoral area directors have already rejected taking part in a study.
The group pushing for a governance study for Greater Vernon is upset at Coldstream council, but the BC government won't be taking action. The Greater Vernon Governance Society issued a news release today, saying it had asked BC's Community Minister to review Coldstream council's conduct, accusing the elected reps of having a "predetermined decision" and personal biases against a study looking into the pros and cons of unification or amalgamation. Vernon-Monashee MLA Eric Foster spoke with senior government reps from that ministry about the request today. "The opinion is the Coldstream council didn't do anything in contravention to the Local Government Act, so that's the end of the conversation for us," says Foster. Foster says if Coldstream had done something contrary to the act, there could have been a discussion, but he says that doesn't appear to be the case. On Tuesday, Foster said the province won't be funding a study into the governance issue, as requested by Vernon council and the governance society, unless all jurisdictions want one. Coldstream and the electoral area directors have already rejected taking part in a study.
Review demanded of Coldstream council's actions
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Jan 29, 2014 at 7:00 AM
The fight over Greater Vernon governance is heating up. The Greater Vernon Governance Society is demanding the provincial government review actions taken by Coldstream council prior to it deciding not to support a study into possibly merging local jurisdictions. “Their actions of meeting as a quorum with the Coldstream Ratepayers Association, and encouraging the 60 ratepayers in attendance at that meeting to come out and support their position to not agree to any study, clearly shows they had predetermined their decision because of their personal biases toward not changing the governance structure in the area,” states a society release. “We believe, in common with other municipal jurisdictions, councillors should not offer personal opinions in public forums, and when a quorum of elected officials is present and speaking on a topic, formal minutes should be taken and entered into the public record.” The society is calling for all jurisdictions to hold a referendum this fall asking residents if they support a governance study. Look for more in Friday's Morning Star.
 |
| Click to enlarge! |
BEYOND THE HEADLINES: Very little wiggle room
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Jan 29, 2014 at 1:00 AM
It can only be described as a rapid-fire slap-down. Not even half-a-day after Vernon council voted unanimously to ask the provincial government for a governance study, officials in Victoria took a firm stand Tuesday. “We will not fund a study unless all parties involved want to do it,” said MLA Eric Foster, just moments after getting off the phone with Community Development Minister Coralee Oakes. And given that Coldstream and Areas B and C recently thumbed their noses at a petition request for a governance study, Foster’s comments are the final kiss of death. “Unless Vernon is able to convince the other parties to participate, that’s it for us,” said Foster of the provincial government. Now, it should be pointed out that the City of Vernon wasn’t being heavy handed Monday. It was responding directly to a request from the Greater Vernon Governance Society to pursue a study. The society collected 3,160 names on a petition. Mayor Rob Sawatzky cautioned that the city isn’t trying to bully Coldstream and the electoral areas to reverse their stances. “They should do what they believe is best for their constituents,” he said. Council members were also quick to indicate they neither favour or oppose the concept of amalgamation but there is a need to address this reoccurring debate once and for all. Within minutes of the motions being adopted, the other jurisdictions were standing their ground. “I’m in total disagreement with them,” said Maria Besso, a Coldstream councillor. “Vernon can do what it wants but it can’t drag in the other jurisdictions,” added Mike Macnabb, BX-Silver Star director. Now consider that in the last three years, there has largely been peace in the valley. Simmering disputes over parks, recreation and water have been resolved and officials from Vernon, Coldstream and the electoral areas have fostered an environment of mutual respect. It’s possible the provincial government, which has previously played referee in Greater Vernon spats, is thrilled with the era of co-operation, and realizes that even the slightest push for amalgamation could reignite the bad old days. Turf wars consume significant resources as ministry staff try to calm all of the parties down. Victoria may also have looked at the 3,160 names on the petition, and while extremely impressive given growing public cynicism and apathy, it’s only seven per cent of the total 45,000 eligible voters in Greater Vernon. Is that worth the ministry being possibly perceived as dictatorial and forcing a governance study when three of the four jurisdictions clearly aren’t interested. There haven’t been any forced amalgamations in B.C. since the early 1970s (Kelowna and Kamloops) and that’s because stripping a community of the right to determine its own destiny creates baggage. Of course the issue of governance may not be completely over. Foster has suggested the City of Vernon could pay for a review on its own. Council could also still use this November’s election to ask residents if they support the creation of a restructure committee. But at a time when the city is riding budgets tight and crying poor when it comes to infrastructure, would a governance study be an effective use of cash? And even if Vernon residents overwhelmingly voted for a study, it would prove nothing if there’s no willing dance partner. Some officials and residents will be unhappy with what’s occurred, but Victoria has spoken.
It can only be described as a rapid-fire slap-down. Not even half-a-day after Vernon council voted unanimously to ask the provincial government for a governance study, officials in Victoria took a firm stand Tuesday. “We will not fund a study unless all parties involved want to do it,” said MLA Eric Foster, just moments after getting off the phone with Community Development Minister Coralee Oakes. And given that Coldstream and Areas B and C recently thumbed their noses at a petition request for a governance study, Foster’s comments are the final kiss of death. “Unless Vernon is able to convince the other parties to participate, that’s it for us,” said Foster of the provincial government. Now, it should be pointed out that the City of Vernon wasn’t being heavy handed Monday. It was responding directly to a request from the Greater Vernon Governance Society to pursue a study. The society collected 3,160 names on a petition. Mayor Rob Sawatzky cautioned that the city isn’t trying to bully Coldstream and the electoral areas to reverse their stances. “They should do what they believe is best for their constituents,” he said. Council members were also quick to indicate they neither favour or oppose the concept of amalgamation but there is a need to address this reoccurring debate once and for all. Within minutes of the motions being adopted, the other jurisdictions were standing their ground. “I’m in total disagreement with them,” said Maria Besso, a Coldstream councillor. “Vernon can do what it wants but it can’t drag in the other jurisdictions,” added Mike Macnabb, BX-Silver Star director. Now consider that in the last three years, there has largely been peace in the valley. Simmering disputes over parks, recreation and water have been resolved and officials from Vernon, Coldstream and the electoral areas have fostered an environment of mutual respect. It’s possible the provincial government, which has previously played referee in Greater Vernon spats, is thrilled with the era of co-operation, and realizes that even the slightest push for amalgamation could reignite the bad old days. Turf wars consume significant resources as ministry staff try to calm all of the parties down. Victoria may also have looked at the 3,160 names on the petition, and while extremely impressive given growing public cynicism and apathy, it’s only seven per cent of the total 45,000 eligible voters in Greater Vernon. Is that worth the ministry being possibly perceived as dictatorial and forcing a governance study when three of the four jurisdictions clearly aren’t interested. There haven’t been any forced amalgamations in B.C. since the early 1970s (Kelowna and Kamloops) and that’s because stripping a community of the right to determine its own destiny creates baggage. Of course the issue of governance may not be completely over. Foster has suggested the City of Vernon could pay for a review on its own. Council could also still use this November’s election to ask residents if they support the creation of a restructure committee. But at a time when the city is riding budgets tight and crying poor when it comes to infrastructure, would a governance study be an effective use of cash? And even if Vernon residents overwhelmingly voted for a study, it would prove nothing if there’s no willing dance partner. Some officials and residents will be unhappy with what’s occurred, but Victoria has spoken.
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
MLA Says BC Won't Fund Study Without More Support
Written by Ron Manz 107.5 KISSFM Tuesday, 28 January 2014 15:15
It doesn't look like the province will proceed with a study into local governance restructuring, despite a request for that from Vernon council. Vernon Monashee MLA Eric Foster called Community, Sport and Cultural Development Minister Coralee Oakes this morning to clarify the situation, and says the request needs more than just Vernon's support. "The policy is very simple: We do not fund a study unless all parties are interested, so if the city wishes to do a study, they can do it, but it will not be funded by the province unless other participants are interested in having it done," Foster tells Kiss FM. Foster says he wasn't totally surprised Vernon council passed unanimous motions Monday to request the province to conduct a fact-finding study to determine the most efficient and cost-effective governance model. Council's other motion was to put the issue on the ballot this November for residents to decide if the study should proceed."I don't get surprised much anymore so I wouldn't say that, but I kind of thought they (Vernon council) might just let it go, knowing the other partners weren't interested, but obviously they felt strongly enough to support it," says Foster. Foster says the governance issue may be resurrected in the fall, depending on what happens, and who gets elected in the municipal elections.
-------------
It's like beating a dead dog. That's the reaction from Coldstream Mayor Jim Garlick to Vernon council deciding Monday to ask the province to do a local governance study and put it to a public vote this fall. Coldstream and the electoral areas have already nixed the idea. Garlick says Vernon's motion is like Coldstream asking the province to start a study with Lumby and Area D to unilaterally amalgamate them. He says that wouldn't go over too well, and neither does this move by Vernon. Garlick says there is no economic benefit to Coldstream amalgamating with Vernon and his municipality is posting its financial report and Vernon's on its website for comparison purposes for residents.
It doesn't look like the province will proceed with a study into local governance restructuring, despite a request for that from Vernon council. Vernon Monashee MLA Eric Foster called Community, Sport and Cultural Development Minister Coralee Oakes this morning to clarify the situation, and says the request needs more than just Vernon's support. "The policy is very simple: We do not fund a study unless all parties are interested, so if the city wishes to do a study, they can do it, but it will not be funded by the province unless other participants are interested in having it done," Foster tells Kiss FM. Foster says he wasn't totally surprised Vernon council passed unanimous motions Monday to request the province to conduct a fact-finding study to determine the most efficient and cost-effective governance model. Council's other motion was to put the issue on the ballot this November for residents to decide if the study should proceed."I don't get surprised much anymore so I wouldn't say that, but I kind of thought they (Vernon council) might just let it go, knowing the other partners weren't interested, but obviously they felt strongly enough to support it," says Foster. Foster says the governance issue may be resurrected in the fall, depending on what happens, and who gets elected in the municipal elections.
-------------
It's like beating a dead dog. That's the reaction from Coldstream Mayor Jim Garlick to Vernon council deciding Monday to ask the province to do a local governance study and put it to a public vote this fall. Coldstream and the electoral areas have already nixed the idea. Garlick says Vernon's motion is like Coldstream asking the province to start a study with Lumby and Area D to unilaterally amalgamate them. He says that wouldn't go over too well, and neither does this move by Vernon. Garlick says there is no economic benefit to Coldstream amalgamating with Vernon and his municipality is posting its financial report and Vernon's on its website for comparison purposes for residents.
107.5 KISSFM Poll: FINAL Results
Do you agree with Vernon Council asking for a governance study even though Coldstream and the electoral areas don't want one?
Yes 21 - 37.5%
No 35 - 62.5%
Number of Voters : 56
Do you agree with Vernon Council asking for a governance study even though Coldstream and the electoral areas don't want one?
Yes 21 - 37.5%
No 35 - 62.5%
Number of Voters : 56
City supports amalgamation despite veto
by Carmen Weld - Castanet Jan 28, 2014 / 9:00 am
Despite a clear veto from the District of Coldstream and Electoral Area’s B and C, the City of Vernon is keeping the recent amalgamation study on the table. Although the province has already stated that a study will not be conducted unless at least two of the parties agree, the city feels it is still worth considering -- even suggesting the mayor send a letter urging the others areas to reconsider their decision. “There seems to be enough interest in our whole region in exploring this and taking a look at least. Obviously there are some people that are dissatisfied with the way things are now,” argued Councillor Catherine Lord, who is in favour of having the study conducted.
Councillors Lord and Bob Spiers put forward a motion to not only support the Greater Vernon Governance Society’s request for an amalgamation study, but to also send a letter urging other districts to reconsider. They also want to see a question about the possible amalgamation put onto the next civic election ballot; happening in November 2014. The councillors received full support from council on all three motions. Vernon Mayor Rob Sawatzky insists this move by council is not meant to step on anyone’s toes, but more to keep the debate on the table and answer the questions once and for all. “I think there is a real intention on the part of this council not to intrude on the autonomy of other jurisdictions. We have no intention of telling them how they should deal with this; we are only providing this as a model or suggestion or possibility,” shared Sawatzky. Coldstream Council and Regional District Directors from Areas B and C have made it very clear they are against the study, which would investigate uniting Greater Vernon’s four jurisdictions under one governance structure. They feel their position has been stated clearly and this should be a done issue. The city is not listening to what they say, is a clear message they have received from their constituents. “They are welcome to make those resolutions and send those letters but I don’t think it will go very far,” said Maria Besso, a councillor with the District of Coldstream who was in attendance at the meeting. That thought was reiterated by Electoral Area C Director Mike Macnabb, who feels this is a closed issue. “I am struggling with this a little bit because the Coldstream council and Area’s B and C said they have no interest in doing the study,” he said. “I think the only people that are interested in this is the City of Vernon, and I think that is perhaps because they would like a bigger tax base.” City of Vernon Council argued the study is of no cost to them and would finally put the issue to rest; something the others say is just not true. “We are in the midst of doing a lot of very important work for our constituents right now and this would be a huge time consuming distraction on our staff,” said Councillor Besso. “As a provincial tax payer I would be very upset with the provincial government if they were to unilaterally, based on only Vernon’s position, conduct the study.” City of Vernon council will now send a letter to the other jurisdictions to ask for their reconsideration of the topic, but Besso and Macnabb say it’s a done deal and their voters do not want the study done. “The question that needs to be asked is who benefits and what is so broken that we need to fix it,” queried Director Macnabb.
-----------
Actual Motions Passed:City supports governance model study
(Media Release from City of Vernon)
Despite a clear veto from the District of Coldstream and Electoral Area’s B and C, the City of Vernon is keeping the recent amalgamation study on the table. Although the province has already stated that a study will not be conducted unless at least two of the parties agree, the city feels it is still worth considering -- even suggesting the mayor send a letter urging the others areas to reconsider their decision. “There seems to be enough interest in our whole region in exploring this and taking a look at least. Obviously there are some people that are dissatisfied with the way things are now,” argued Councillor Catherine Lord, who is in favour of having the study conducted.
Councillors Lord and Bob Spiers put forward a motion to not only support the Greater Vernon Governance Society’s request for an amalgamation study, but to also send a letter urging other districts to reconsider. They also want to see a question about the possible amalgamation put onto the next civic election ballot; happening in November 2014. The councillors received full support from council on all three motions. Vernon Mayor Rob Sawatzky insists this move by council is not meant to step on anyone’s toes, but more to keep the debate on the table and answer the questions once and for all. “I think there is a real intention on the part of this council not to intrude on the autonomy of other jurisdictions. We have no intention of telling them how they should deal with this; we are only providing this as a model or suggestion or possibility,” shared Sawatzky. Coldstream Council and Regional District Directors from Areas B and C have made it very clear they are against the study, which would investigate uniting Greater Vernon’s four jurisdictions under one governance structure. They feel their position has been stated clearly and this should be a done issue. The city is not listening to what they say, is a clear message they have received from their constituents. “They are welcome to make those resolutions and send those letters but I don’t think it will go very far,” said Maria Besso, a councillor with the District of Coldstream who was in attendance at the meeting. That thought was reiterated by Electoral Area C Director Mike Macnabb, who feels this is a closed issue. “I am struggling with this a little bit because the Coldstream council and Area’s B and C said they have no interest in doing the study,” he said. “I think the only people that are interested in this is the City of Vernon, and I think that is perhaps because they would like a bigger tax base.” City of Vernon Council argued the study is of no cost to them and would finally put the issue to rest; something the others say is just not true. “We are in the midst of doing a lot of very important work for our constituents right now and this would be a huge time consuming distraction on our staff,” said Councillor Besso. “As a provincial tax payer I would be very upset with the provincial government if they were to unilaterally, based on only Vernon’s position, conduct the study.” City of Vernon council will now send a letter to the other jurisdictions to ask for their reconsideration of the topic, but Besso and Macnabb say it’s a done deal and their voters do not want the study done. “The question that needs to be asked is who benefits and what is so broken that we need to fix it,” queried Director Macnabb.
-----------
Actual Motions Passed:City supports governance model study
(Media Release from City of Vernon)
Council Resolution Jan 27, 2014
City supports governance model study
(Media Release from City of Vernon)
Don Quixote Note: Interesting Post by the Coldstreamer in reaction to this resolution:
http://coldstreamernews.blogspot.ca/2014/01/resolution-by-vernon-council-to-help-us.html
(Media Release from City of Vernon)
Don Quixote Note: Interesting Post by the Coldstreamer in reaction to this resolution:
http://coldstreamernews.blogspot.ca/2014/01/resolution-by-vernon-council-to-help-us.html
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Amalgamation blocked
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Jan 19, 2014 at 1:00 AM
Greater Vernon’s rural politicians have officially rejected amalgamation. On Thursday, the Electoral Area Advisory Committee passed a motion opposing the Greater Vernon Governance Society’s request for a study into merging Areas B and C with Vernon and Coldstream. “It formalized what we had already said before. It put this on the record,” said Bob Fleming, BX-Swan Lake director. The society collected 3,160 names, including 291 in Areas B and C, asking local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine regional governments into a single entity. However, Fleming points to a regional district survey in 2008 that indicated electoral area residents were overwhelmingly happy with their form of governance. “The question of governance has been asked and answered and the society provided no new information.” While the society has stated there would be no downside to a study, Fleming disagrees. “It would create upset for a certain period of time and the would be a cost of money and time for the provincial government and local governments,” he said. Director Mike Macnabb, is confident that he represents the majority of his constituents in BX-Silver Star. “People believe they are well-served and the issue of maintaining local autonomy keeps coming up,” he said. Coldstream council has also rejected a governance study while Vernon council will consider the society’s request Jan. 27.
Greater Vernon’s rural politicians have officially rejected amalgamation. On Thursday, the Electoral Area Advisory Committee passed a motion opposing the Greater Vernon Governance Society’s request for a study into merging Areas B and C with Vernon and Coldstream. “It formalized what we had already said before. It put this on the record,” said Bob Fleming, BX-Swan Lake director. The society collected 3,160 names, including 291 in Areas B and C, asking local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine regional governments into a single entity. However, Fleming points to a regional district survey in 2008 that indicated electoral area residents were overwhelmingly happy with their form of governance. “The question of governance has been asked and answered and the society provided no new information.” While the society has stated there would be no downside to a study, Fleming disagrees. “It would create upset for a certain period of time and the would be a cost of money and time for the provincial government and local governments,” he said. Director Mike Macnabb, is confident that he represents the majority of his constituents in BX-Silver Star. “People believe they are well-served and the issue of maintaining local autonomy keeps coming up,” he said. Coldstream council has also rejected a governance study while Vernon council will consider the society’s request Jan. 27.
Friday, January 17, 2014
BEYOND THE HEADLINES: Getting it right
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Jan 15, 2014 at 1:00 AM
It’s easy to be cynical about politicians, particularly given what has gone on in Ottawa over the past year. So when Coldstream council votes unanimously to not endorse a study into amalgamating Greater Vernon, some will insist the 816 Coldstream residents who signed the petition are being ignored and this move is nothing but crass politics. And certainly that case can be made as self-preservation is a trait not uncommon to elected officials, especially when elections are just 10 months away. However, perhaps there is another motivation at work. Consider that while 816 people signed the petition demanding a study into governance, there are a total of 7,424 eligible voters in Coldstream. It’s hard to know where the silent majority stands — either opposed, indifferent or they couldn’t be bothered to pick up a pen — but there have been some signs of where residents stand. About 40 people recently attended a Coldstream Ratepayers Association session to raise concerns about the topic (small attendance but not everyone has time to go to a meeting or they didn’t know about the event). There have also been phone calls to council members and letters to the editor. And at Monday’s council meeting, the gallery was full, largely with opponents to amalgamation, while several letters were also received (disclosure: I live in Coldstream). There was a common theme. “I don’t want any of my money going to a study on amalgamation,” said resident Flo Ryan. Now, if a study were to proceed, it would be the provincial government providing the funds, but there is only one taxpayer so that money would still come out of our pockets. Retired accountant Bob Weatherill spoke for many residents when he said, “I do not want to lose Coldstream. It’s a special community and I want it to stay that way.” Keep in mind too that while we live in a democracy, signing a petition doesn’t mean elected officials will provide the response you want. In 2012, 1,670 names on a petition demanded reinstatement of the Okanagan Landing firefighters but Vernon council blocked a formal presentation, while a 3,191-name petition pushing for expanded transit was shelved by city hall. A number of factors come into play when considering requests, including whether it’s financially reasonable or reflective of the community’s broad interests. Making decisions isn’t always about being popular. What also didn’t help proponents of the governance study is apparent confusion about their goal. Their petition question asked, “Do you support a review by local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine our regional governments into a single entity for the purpose of more efficient use of our local tax dollars?” But on Monday, they were stating they aren’t necessarily in favour of amalgamation, but want to review options. Which one is it? Also, what would a study prove? Much of the information comparing how the jurisdictions operate already exists if you are willing to sit down and look at it. Amalgamations across the country have also been explored to death. In the end, Coldstream council and the directors for Areas B and C have shot down a governance study, and while history or this fall’s election may prove them wrong, it appears they got this one right. It isn’t clear that the vast majority of citizens in those jurisdictions, or even Vernon for that matter, are beating down the door and demanding change. It’s time to move on to other more pressing issues.
It’s easy to be cynical about politicians, particularly given what has gone on in Ottawa over the past year. So when Coldstream council votes unanimously to not endorse a study into amalgamating Greater Vernon, some will insist the 816 Coldstream residents who signed the petition are being ignored and this move is nothing but crass politics. And certainly that case can be made as self-preservation is a trait not uncommon to elected officials, especially when elections are just 10 months away. However, perhaps there is another motivation at work. Consider that while 816 people signed the petition demanding a study into governance, there are a total of 7,424 eligible voters in Coldstream. It’s hard to know where the silent majority stands — either opposed, indifferent or they couldn’t be bothered to pick up a pen — but there have been some signs of where residents stand. About 40 people recently attended a Coldstream Ratepayers Association session to raise concerns about the topic (small attendance but not everyone has time to go to a meeting or they didn’t know about the event). There have also been phone calls to council members and letters to the editor. And at Monday’s council meeting, the gallery was full, largely with opponents to amalgamation, while several letters were also received (disclosure: I live in Coldstream). There was a common theme. “I don’t want any of my money going to a study on amalgamation,” said resident Flo Ryan. Now, if a study were to proceed, it would be the provincial government providing the funds, but there is only one taxpayer so that money would still come out of our pockets. Retired accountant Bob Weatherill spoke for many residents when he said, “I do not want to lose Coldstream. It’s a special community and I want it to stay that way.” Keep in mind too that while we live in a democracy, signing a petition doesn’t mean elected officials will provide the response you want. In 2012, 1,670 names on a petition demanded reinstatement of the Okanagan Landing firefighters but Vernon council blocked a formal presentation, while a 3,191-name petition pushing for expanded transit was shelved by city hall. A number of factors come into play when considering requests, including whether it’s financially reasonable or reflective of the community’s broad interests. Making decisions isn’t always about being popular. What also didn’t help proponents of the governance study is apparent confusion about their goal. Their petition question asked, “Do you support a review by local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine our regional governments into a single entity for the purpose of more efficient use of our local tax dollars?” But on Monday, they were stating they aren’t necessarily in favour of amalgamation, but want to review options. Which one is it? Also, what would a study prove? Much of the information comparing how the jurisdictions operate already exists if you are willing to sit down and look at it. Amalgamations across the country have also been explored to death. In the end, Coldstream council and the directors for Areas B and C have shot down a governance study, and while history or this fall’s election may prove them wrong, it appears they got this one right. It isn’t clear that the vast majority of citizens in those jurisdictions, or even Vernon for that matter, are beating down the door and demanding change. It’s time to move on to other more pressing issues.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
MLA Says Governance Issue Likely Done
Written by Glen Morrison 107.5 KISSFM Wednesday, 15 January 2014 14:14
Vernon's MLA says the the local governance issue is likely over for now. Eric Foster says with Coldstream and the electoral areas saying no to a study, it would be highly unlikely to proceed. "We will see what the city council does when they bring the topic up again (Jan 27 at the next council meeting) but I would be surprised if we got a request from them (for a study). It's certainly up to the city to make a request, but what would happen then, I don't know for sure," Foster tells Kiss FM. Foster notes Vernon Mayor Rob Sawatzky was quoted in the Morning Star saying it would be illogical to go ahead if the partners weren't interested. "So from that, I'm going to make an assumption that we're not going to get a request from local government," says Foster. The MLA says from the beginning the province, and even Premier Christy Clark, have been clear that it's a locally driven issue.
-----------
Amalgamation unlikely to move forward: MLA
By Charlotte Helston Info-Tel Multimedia January 15, 2014 - 3:15 PM
VERNON - Efforts to amalgamate the four jurisdictions of Greater Vernon appear to have hit the end of the road. Even supporting a study of unification was unanimously voted down by Coldstream council Monday. There’s similarly no interest from Area B and C directors, and even though the City of Vernon was expected to vote in favour of doing the study in two weeks time, it’s likely not enough for the province to act on. Vernon-Monashee MLA Eric Foster believes the support of at least two municipalities was needed for the province to fund a study on the pros and cons of amalgamation. “As we’ve said from the start—myself, the premier and the minister—this has to be locally driven. We don’t initiate the studies, requests have to come from local government,” Foster says. Without agreement from at least two municipalities, Foster says there’s not much the provincial government can do. “We do not force amalgamation on anyone,” Foster says. “Obviously the other three jurisdictions are not interested. I really don’t see anything moving forward now.” President of the Greater Vernon Governance Society Bruce Shepherd says there’s “frustration and disappointment” among amalgamation proponents, though they’re not calling it quits just yet. “We’ve got our annual meeting in two weeks. At the moment, we’re waiting until we get together and put all our thoughts together and we’ll see what happens,” Shepherd says. The society is currently awaiting clarification from the province on its requirements for funding the study. The group’s original understanding was that strong petition results would be enough to prompt a review on the matter, and with 3,160 names, Shepherd believes they accomplished that. Foster insists the province hasn’t wavered on its original instructions to the society that local government support was a must. He applauds the initiative and says there may be other ways for the 3,160 people who signed the petition to make their voices heard. “I would suggest to those people that there’s a great big referendum next fall and they can have their say at that time,” Foster says. “Whether it will be an issue during the campaign, I don’t know, but it may be part of the conversation.”
Vernon's MLA says the the local governance issue is likely over for now. Eric Foster says with Coldstream and the electoral areas saying no to a study, it would be highly unlikely to proceed. "We will see what the city council does when they bring the topic up again (Jan 27 at the next council meeting) but I would be surprised if we got a request from them (for a study). It's certainly up to the city to make a request, but what would happen then, I don't know for sure," Foster tells Kiss FM. Foster notes Vernon Mayor Rob Sawatzky was quoted in the Morning Star saying it would be illogical to go ahead if the partners weren't interested. "So from that, I'm going to make an assumption that we're not going to get a request from local government," says Foster. The MLA says from the beginning the province, and even Premier Christy Clark, have been clear that it's a locally driven issue.
-----------
Amalgamation unlikely to move forward: MLA
By Charlotte Helston Info-Tel Multimedia January 15, 2014 - 3:15 PM
VERNON - Efforts to amalgamate the four jurisdictions of Greater Vernon appear to have hit the end of the road. Even supporting a study of unification was unanimously voted down by Coldstream council Monday. There’s similarly no interest from Area B and C directors, and even though the City of Vernon was expected to vote in favour of doing the study in two weeks time, it’s likely not enough for the province to act on. Vernon-Monashee MLA Eric Foster believes the support of at least two municipalities was needed for the province to fund a study on the pros and cons of amalgamation. “As we’ve said from the start—myself, the premier and the minister—this has to be locally driven. We don’t initiate the studies, requests have to come from local government,” Foster says. Without agreement from at least two municipalities, Foster says there’s not much the provincial government can do. “We do not force amalgamation on anyone,” Foster says. “Obviously the other three jurisdictions are not interested. I really don’t see anything moving forward now.” President of the Greater Vernon Governance Society Bruce Shepherd says there’s “frustration and disappointment” among amalgamation proponents, though they’re not calling it quits just yet. “We’ve got our annual meeting in two weeks. At the moment, we’re waiting until we get together and put all our thoughts together and we’ll see what happens,” Shepherd says. The society is currently awaiting clarification from the province on its requirements for funding the study. The group’s original understanding was that strong petition results would be enough to prompt a review on the matter, and with 3,160 names, Shepherd believes they accomplished that. Foster insists the province hasn’t wavered on its original instructions to the society that local government support was a must. He applauds the initiative and says there may be other ways for the 3,160 people who signed the petition to make their voices heard. “I would suggest to those people that there’s a great big referendum next fall and they can have their say at that time,” Foster says. “Whether it will be an issue during the campaign, I don’t know, but it may be part of the conversation.”
Amalgamation study hits dead-end
by Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star posted Jan 15, 2014 at 1:00 AM
Efforts to reform Greater Vernon’s governance structure have collapsed. Coldstream council and the directors for Areas B and C have blocked calls for a study into merging those jurisdictions with Vernon. “If they won’t request it, nothing happens,” said Bruce Shepherd, Greater Vernon Governance Society president. The only jurisdiction that has not responded to the society’s request for a study is Vernon and city council will make a decision Jan. 27. The society recently collected 3,160 names on a petition, including 816 in Coldstream, asking local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine regional governments into a single entity. However, before a large crowd of largely amalgamation opponents, Coldstream council voted unanimously Monday not to endorse the process. “It’s not in the best interest of Coldstream to proceed with this,” said Coun. Pat Cochrane, who made the motion to turn down the request from the society. “It’s not just financial. It’s about lifestyle and agricultural land.” Councillors stated that amalgamation would dilute Coldstream residents’ say over major issues and likely lead to increased taxes, while a study would consume financial resources and staff time. “All measurable information already exists,” said Coun. Doug Dirk of comparing how the jurisdictions operate. “I don’t see any value in pursuing it (study).” Coun. Maria Besso told society members that all of the jurisdictions have gone to great strides to co-operate and find efficiencies. “Some of the problems you perceive are things of the past. We’ve tried to change things,” she said of agreements on water, parks and recreation. The representatives for Areas B and C were also at Monday’s Coldstream council meeting and they were also clear on where they stand. “The phone calls I’ve had are from people asking, ‘How do I vote against this?’” said Bob Fleming, BX-Swan Lake director. Fleming says a regional district survey in 2008 also indicated electoral area residents were overwhelmingly happy with their form of governance. “This question has been asked and answered.” Mike Macnabb, BX-Silver Star director, believes the current model provides residents with accountability. “You would lose local autonomy (through amalgamation) that reflects the neighbourhoods in which you live,” he said. Shepherd admits he is disappointed with the decision made by Coldstream and Areas B and C. “We found a lot of people want more information on the topic and that wasn’t accomplished tonight,” he said. Shepherd wouldn’t speculate on the society’s next steps, such as running candidates in November’s civic elections, or if it will promote a governance change in the future. “Perhaps down the road, it may surface again,” he said of the issue. While Vernon council hasn’t formed a position yet on a governance study, Mayor Rob Sawatzky anticipates the matter has hit a dead-end. “It would be illogical to ask the government to fund a study if there are no partners,” he said, adding that Victoria should not mandate a study. “You should never force these things on to people in a democratic society.” Sawatzky had called for a study without indicating where he stands on amalgamation. “If someone else is funding a search for more information, I’m always in support of that,” he said. Eric Foster, Vernon-Monashee MLA, reiterates that the government will not force a new governance model. “We have been clear that this isn’t driven by us. This is locally driven. It doesn’t look promising for a study,” he said. But while Coldstream and the electoral areas are opposed, Foster says he is waiting to see what Vernon does with the study request. “I am not sure what would happen (if the city votes in favour of a study). That response would come from the ministry,” he said.
---------------
An interesting posting related to amalgamation as suggested from a blogreader:
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/01/13/amalgamation_brought_fewer_ontario_cities_but_more_city_workers_report_finds.html
(Excerpt:) It was dubbed the Common Sense Revolution — Progressive Conservative premier Mike Harris’s 1995 campaign to slash the province’s bloated public sector through massive municipal government restructuring, to the tune of $250 million in taxpayer savings.
But new analysis has found that while amalgamation technically decreased the number of municipalities in Ontario — down from 850 to 445 — and 23 per cent of elected official positions were axed, more people than ever are working in Ontario’s municipal governments.
“The conclusion is very strong: amalgamation didn’t reduce the size of municipal government,” said Timothy Cobban, political science professor at Western University and lead researcher.
Efforts to reform Greater Vernon’s governance structure have collapsed. Coldstream council and the directors for Areas B and C have blocked calls for a study into merging those jurisdictions with Vernon. “If they won’t request it, nothing happens,” said Bruce Shepherd, Greater Vernon Governance Society president. The only jurisdiction that has not responded to the society’s request for a study is Vernon and city council will make a decision Jan. 27. The society recently collected 3,160 names on a petition, including 816 in Coldstream, asking local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine regional governments into a single entity. However, before a large crowd of largely amalgamation opponents, Coldstream council voted unanimously Monday not to endorse the process. “It’s not in the best interest of Coldstream to proceed with this,” said Coun. Pat Cochrane, who made the motion to turn down the request from the society. “It’s not just financial. It’s about lifestyle and agricultural land.” Councillors stated that amalgamation would dilute Coldstream residents’ say over major issues and likely lead to increased taxes, while a study would consume financial resources and staff time. “All measurable information already exists,” said Coun. Doug Dirk of comparing how the jurisdictions operate. “I don’t see any value in pursuing it (study).” Coun. Maria Besso told society members that all of the jurisdictions have gone to great strides to co-operate and find efficiencies. “Some of the problems you perceive are things of the past. We’ve tried to change things,” she said of agreements on water, parks and recreation. The representatives for Areas B and C were also at Monday’s Coldstream council meeting and they were also clear on where they stand. “The phone calls I’ve had are from people asking, ‘How do I vote against this?’” said Bob Fleming, BX-Swan Lake director. Fleming says a regional district survey in 2008 also indicated electoral area residents were overwhelmingly happy with their form of governance. “This question has been asked and answered.” Mike Macnabb, BX-Silver Star director, believes the current model provides residents with accountability. “You would lose local autonomy (through amalgamation) that reflects the neighbourhoods in which you live,” he said. Shepherd admits he is disappointed with the decision made by Coldstream and Areas B and C. “We found a lot of people want more information on the topic and that wasn’t accomplished tonight,” he said. Shepherd wouldn’t speculate on the society’s next steps, such as running candidates in November’s civic elections, or if it will promote a governance change in the future. “Perhaps down the road, it may surface again,” he said of the issue. While Vernon council hasn’t formed a position yet on a governance study, Mayor Rob Sawatzky anticipates the matter has hit a dead-end. “It would be illogical to ask the government to fund a study if there are no partners,” he said, adding that Victoria should not mandate a study. “You should never force these things on to people in a democratic society.” Sawatzky had called for a study without indicating where he stands on amalgamation. “If someone else is funding a search for more information, I’m always in support of that,” he said. Eric Foster, Vernon-Monashee MLA, reiterates that the government will not force a new governance model. “We have been clear that this isn’t driven by us. This is locally driven. It doesn’t look promising for a study,” he said. But while Coldstream and the electoral areas are opposed, Foster says he is waiting to see what Vernon does with the study request. “I am not sure what would happen (if the city votes in favour of a study). That response would come from the ministry,” he said.
---------------
An interesting posting related to amalgamation as suggested from a blogreader:
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/01/13/amalgamation_brought_fewer_ontario_cities_but_more_city_workers_report_finds.html
(Excerpt:) It was dubbed the Common Sense Revolution — Progressive Conservative premier Mike Harris’s 1995 campaign to slash the province’s bloated public sector through massive municipal government restructuring, to the tune of $250 million in taxpayer savings.
But new analysis has found that while amalgamation technically decreased the number of municipalities in Ontario — down from 850 to 445 — and 23 per cent of elected official positions were axed, more people than ever are working in Ontario’s municipal governments.
“The conclusion is very strong: amalgamation didn’t reduce the size of municipal government,” said Timothy Cobban, political science professor at Western University and lead researcher.
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Governance Group To Reconsider Options
Written by Peter McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:50
The Greater Vernon Governance Society will decide its next move after its annual general meeting in two weeks. President Bruce Shepherd admits it's a setback that their request for a unification study has been turned down by Coldstream council, along with the directors for Areas B and C. "Of course we're disappointed, but at this time I don't think I want to go beyond that. I think we're best now to wait until we have a meeting as a group and go from there," Shepherd tells Kiss FM. Area C (BX-Silver Star) director Mike Macnabb felt the society's motives were biased. "Really the unification folks wanted amalgamation. That's the direction that they would go, even in the terms of reference, and I don't think that's fair, and I'm not going to support it." Macnabb says he and Area B director Bob Fleming indicated their concerns when they met with Shepherd and director Peter Moore before Christmas to discuss the issue. Fleming, director for BX-Swan Lake, disagrees with the society's claim there's no down side to a study. "The down side is, at a bare minimum, it's going to cost the provincial government $100,000, and as soon as you initiate that, you're putting expectations into people's heads about what's going to happen." While MLA Eric Foster isn't available today, it's believed the study needed the backing of at least two local governments to get the province to consider funding it. Vernon council delayed its vote to support the society's request until January 27.
The Greater Vernon Governance Society will decide its next move after its annual general meeting in two weeks. President Bruce Shepherd admits it's a setback that their request for a unification study has been turned down by Coldstream council, along with the directors for Areas B and C. "Of course we're disappointed, but at this time I don't think I want to go beyond that. I think we're best now to wait until we have a meeting as a group and go from there," Shepherd tells Kiss FM. Area C (BX-Silver Star) director Mike Macnabb felt the society's motives were biased. "Really the unification folks wanted amalgamation. That's the direction that they would go, even in the terms of reference, and I don't think that's fair, and I'm not going to support it." Macnabb says he and Area B director Bob Fleming indicated their concerns when they met with Shepherd and director Peter Moore before Christmas to discuss the issue. Fleming, director for BX-Swan Lake, disagrees with the society's claim there's no down side to a study. "The down side is, at a bare minimum, it's going to cost the provincial government $100,000, and as soon as you initiate that, you're putting expectations into people's heads about what's going to happen." While MLA Eric Foster isn't available today, it's believed the study needed the backing of at least two local governments to get the province to consider funding it. Vernon council delayed its vote to support the society's request until January 27.
Unification Study Looks To Be Stalled
Written by Peter McIntyre 107.5 KISSFM Tuesday, 14 January 2014 12:30
It appears a study looking into unification of Greater Vernon's governance is dead following Coldstream's unanimous rejection of the idea. It's believed the proposal needs at least two local governments to support it to move ahead. Coldstream Mayor Jim Garlick says his council felt there was no benefits to his community to move ahead with a review.The directors for RDNO's electoral areas B and C have also rejected the need for a study. Area B's Bob Fleming (BX Swan Lake) says a review in 2008 showed the majority of their residents (76%) didn't want a change. "My reaction to it, then as now, is, I believe our residents are satisfied with the form of governance they have, and that they would not be interested in pursuing that," says Fleming. Area C director Mike Macnabb (BX Silver Star) also won't back a study. "It would task (municipal) staff to find out the information to work with the ministry, and the reality is, eventually we're going to come to the same concensus, so I don't support going ahead with the idea of a study," Macnabb tells Kiss FM. A majority of Vernon council appears to favour the study but their council put off a vote on the issue until January 27th. No one seems to know who has the final say on the Greater Vernon Governance Society's request for a study, but it could be Vernon Monashee MLA Eric Foster, who has so far, not returned a call for comment from Kiss FM News. The society collected 3,160 names in support of a petition last fall which asked the question: "Do you support a review by local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine our regional governments into a single entity, for the purpose of more efficient use of our local tax dollars?" 2,052 of the names were from Vernon residents, 816 from Coldstream, and 291 from Areas B and C.
It appears a study looking into unification of Greater Vernon's governance is dead following Coldstream's unanimous rejection of the idea. It's believed the proposal needs at least two local governments to support it to move ahead. Coldstream Mayor Jim Garlick says his council felt there was no benefits to his community to move ahead with a review.The directors for RDNO's electoral areas B and C have also rejected the need for a study. Area B's Bob Fleming (BX Swan Lake) says a review in 2008 showed the majority of their residents (76%) didn't want a change. "My reaction to it, then as now, is, I believe our residents are satisfied with the form of governance they have, and that they would not be interested in pursuing that," says Fleming. Area C director Mike Macnabb (BX Silver Star) also won't back a study. "It would task (municipal) staff to find out the information to work with the ministry, and the reality is, eventually we're going to come to the same concensus, so I don't support going ahead with the idea of a study," Macnabb tells Kiss FM. A majority of Vernon council appears to favour the study but their council put off a vote on the issue until January 27th. No one seems to know who has the final say on the Greater Vernon Governance Society's request for a study, but it could be Vernon Monashee MLA Eric Foster, who has so far, not returned a call for comment from Kiss FM News. The society collected 3,160 names in support of a petition last fall which asked the question: "Do you support a review by local and provincial authorities to develop a plan to combine our regional governments into a single entity, for the purpose of more efficient use of our local tax dollars?" 2,052 of the names were from Vernon residents, 816 from Coldstream, and 291 from Areas B and C.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)