Thursday, September 02, 2010

Local politicians are seeking more information before considering a study on horse-related activities.

Provincial agencies will be asked if they support an equestrian centre before the North Okanagan Regional District spends more money. On Wednesday, directors received the terms of reference for a potential feasibility study into an equestrian centre, which would include a race track. But instead of spending $55,000 on the study, it was decided that discussions need to be held with the B.C. Lottery Corporation and the Agricultural Land Commission. “If both organizations support it, it’s worth looking at a new home or doing something there (Kin Race Track),” said director Wayne Lippert. “But if they don’t support it, it will be hard to sell to the public.” ALC approval would be required if a facility was built on about 100 acres in the Agricultural Land Reserve, while the B.C. Lottery Corporation would have to sanction a proposed gaming centre.

NORD spent $8,000 on the preparation of terms of reference by consultant Gary Bannerman. Bannerman recently authored a report that considers possible relocation of Kin Race Track to an equine centre at a new location. Besides racing and gaming, an equestrian centre could also include training, boarding and a veterinary hospital. NORD and the City of Vernon own Kin Race Track and the Okanagan Equestrian Society must leave the property by the end of this year.

The society has taken NORD and the city to court., claiming that equestrian activities were guaranteed when most of Kin Race Track was turned over to the city in 1964 for free.The society also claims NORD ignored an agreement for lease renewals. A tentative court date is set for June 2011. The society may also seek an injunction to prevent this fall’s eviction. Ed Woolley, society president, agrees with NORD’s decision to speak to the ALC and lottery corporation before considering funds for a study. “I’d want to get those conditions out of the way,” he said. Woolley is also pleased NORD looked at the terms of reference. “It’s a positive sign that they are open to other options beyond litigation,” he said.

No comments: