Monday, January 10, 2011

Toronto budget balanced for 2011

CBC News Monday, January 10, 2011
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford's inaugural budget contained no major service cuts and no property tax hikes, though it also came with a strong indication that his expected slash and burn is still to come.  While the 2011 budget proposed Monday is largely a stay-the-course affair, the mayor, who took office last month, warned that the 2012 budget will bring "more significant changes to the way we spend our money."  Most departments and agencies met cost-cutting targets, Ford said. The ones that didn't were told in no uncertain terms that cuts are coming, whether they like it or not.  "Their managers and their boards of directors decided their interests were more important than the taxpayers' interests," Ford said. "I will assure you as part of our upcoming department review process we will focus on those agencies first and foremost. If they are unable to manage effectively in the best interests of the taxpayers, then we will have to find new managers that can."  Beginning in March outside experts will conduct detailed departmental reviews "with a fine-tooth comb" to find savings, Ford said.   "They will leave no stone unturned."  The 2011 budget even amounts to a marginal spending increase — a $9.4-billion gross operating budget this year, compared to $9.3 billion last year.  Ford appears to be buying himself time with this balanced budget, offering an initial period of stability before any dramatic alterations to the budget, said Ryerson University politics professor Myer Siemiatycki.  "Politicians who have been elected on an austerity or retrenchment kind of campaign and platform along the lines of what Mayor Ford ran on, I think are more typically inclined to think that they should cut deep, early and fast," he said.  "It's an interesting signal that Mayor Ford is wanting to take more time to think through the nature of the cuts to come."  Of the $706 million Ford used to balance the budget, just $57 million comes from his service efficiencies and "minor" service level changes, while $268 million is thanks to a projected 2010 surplus and another $78 million from residual surplus from 2009.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe Vernon Council has done something similar in the past. Just send the budget back to the Department heads with a requirement that they trim 2.5% off. Give them an opportunity to respond to this challenge in a way that they deem fitting. In this manner Council can review their wish list items with a 2.5% cushion to work with. Rather than approving priorities under the constraint of each priority meaning a tax increase.
Made sense then, makes way more sense in these tough economic times, and leading up to an election in November.

Anonymous said...

Tough for staff to cut after Council made spending decisions during the year.