Vernon gains additional vote at RDNO

By Richard Rolke - Vernon Morning Star Published: February 12, 2012 1:00 AM

A potential source of conflict in Greater Vernon is now reality.  The City of Vernon will acquire a fourth seat at the Regional District of North Okanagan based on 2011 census figures. “I’m hoping with new people at the table, there won’t be a problem but time will tell,” said Gyula Kiss, a Coldstream director, referring to new city politicians elected in November. Part of the conflict over the parks and recreation function has been linked to Vernon possibly acquiring another vote because of increased population. On Tuesday, Statistics Canada released 2001 census results and Vernon’s population is 38,150, a six per cent increase from 35,979 in 2006. “Based upon the census data, Vernon would be eligible for another director at the regional district board,” said David Sewell, RDNO’s finance general manager. “An additional director for Vernon would occur at any population figure above 37,500.” Kiss has previously expressed concern that with four votes, Vernon could dominate discussions with its partners. A similar view has also come from director Mike Macnabb, who wants a balance of power at the table. “If we (Coldstream and the electoral areas) are going to pay 35 per cent of the total budget, we want some meaningful say,” he said in an August interview. Jim Garlick, Coldstream’s mayor, says an unequal situation could occur if Vernon gets an extra vote. “They will not only be the contract provider but they will have the majority vote,” he said. “It’s a very large budget for the service and it involves land outside of Vernon. There needs to be awareness of the impact outside of Vernon.” However, director Rob Sawatzky, who was elected Vernon’s mayor in November, doesn’t believe an additional seat will be a problem. “I don’t see this changing much of anything,” he said, adding that city directors don’t always vote together. “You represent the city but there are divergent opinions and we have to work with our neighbours.” Sawatzky points out that the parks and recreation function is there to serve all jurisdictions. “Our intent is to work co-operatively for the benefit of everyone,” he said. “We’ve seen what happens on the other side (conflict).”
-----------------

POSSIBLE RDNO Voting 2011 Census basis (Speculative Only

RDNO Voting Pre 2011 CENSUS

Don Quixote Note: It appears Vernon will get another VOTE at the RDNO table as will COLDSTREAM and Spallmucheen . On a weighted vote basis NORD will increase from 36 to 39 votes. The number of Physical Directors will increase from 13 to 14. (Vernon will get another seat at the table and I suspect the 16 votes will be allocated equally among the 4 directors (4 each).)

Vernon always had the absolute majority under any vote done for the GVAC functions done under a weighted vote majority 15-9. This change on weighted votes within GVAC stakeholders now goes to 16-10. It does make  a difference on GVAC votes done by sitting directors on an unweighted basis. Vernon will now have  a 4-3 majority if the vote goes along Jurisdictional lines.

The extra cost to the taxpayers of RDNO  is the meeting pay costs and monthly stipend paid to the extra Municipal director that now will sit at RDNO. 
-------------

I do not think that this will change the composition at the GVAC table where decisions on the Parks and Rec Function  are made and recommended to the RDNO full Board.  Vernon will continue to be in a minority position of 2 Coldstream, 1 area b & 1 area C versus 3 Vernon representatives. Even if it did and Vernon got another director at GVAC there would be an even split and an effective veto at best.