![]() |
Police take a breathalyzer sample from a driver. (CBC) |
DON QUIXOTE VS. CITY HALL When an American gets mad, he says "where's my Gun". When a Canadian gets pissed off he says "Where is my pen, I'm going to send a letter to the EDITOR". When the EDITOR won't publish his letter he sets up his own BLOG page. When I received enough support to get a Council Seat the dogma of the establishment became : "Better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside pissing in." (Only time will tell !)
Thursday, July 12, 2012
No refunds for unconstitutional impaired driving fines
CBC News Posted: Jul 12, 2012 10:59 AM PT
The B.C. government will not have
to pay back fines and fees to people convicted under an unconstitutional
impaired driving law, the B.C. Supreme Court has ruled. At least 15,000 people were fined and penalized for blowing over .08
while the law was in place, paying about $4,500 each in fines and fees. But
on Thursday Justice Jon Sigurdson rejected the argument that the fines
were collected under an invalid law "enacted in bad faith" and should be
refunded "on the principle of unjust enrichment." Sigurdson ruled the government "did not engage in any misconduct or bad faith actions" when it enacted the law. "I have found that the doctrine of qualified immunity provides a complete defence to both of these claims," wrote Sigurdson. Furthermore
Sigurdson ruled that anyone with any outstanding fees, penalties and
suspensions would still have to serve or pay them. Angry B.C. drivers filed a flurry of lawsuits seeking reimbursement
of thousands of dollars in fines and fees, fter Justice Sigurdson
struck down parts of the legislation as unconstitutional, last November. The November ruling found 90-day suspensions and costly interlock devices too harsh for an offence drivers have limited means to appeal. The B.C. government has since passed an amended version of the law, which it says will enhance fairness
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment